• aldfin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Already done most of those, whatsapp is the hardest to replace for me from this category.

  • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Startpage? (based in Netherlands). I mean it’s a frontend for google, but ecosia is a frontend for bing. And startpage has a no log policy which beats ecosia.

    • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      While Signal’s home base is the US, they are a non profit org that doesn’t operate in the same way as for-profit corporations. Also, Signal collects basically zero data so there’s no incentive to sell out, and who would want to buy them anyway when they have no data and the server and client are open source.

      Matrix is great, but I wouldn’t compare it to Signal. I use both for very different purposes.

      • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        XMPP is more comparable to Signal, yes.

        Signal does need (yes, need) a phone number, and most people only have one so that is identifiable info.

        This puts it at mostly the same level as some competitors, including WhatsApp which is often advised against.

      • thyristor@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        Português
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Signal will operate until Elon Musk decides that everyone has to use X to communicate.

      • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This? https://https/://simplex.chat/

        FWIW Matrix and XMPP are also decentralised, much like e-mail is, which is why I recommended it. I’m immediately skeptic about SimpleX’s premise of having no user IDs; they’ll likely need some unique field for each user, this might as well be a UUID or something like that… So what’s the benefit?

        • Blastboom Strice@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Since it’s related, here’s a good comparison:

          https://eylenburg.github.io/im_comparison.htm

          I think the other person here explained the thing about user ids. Matrix and xmpp are good too, they’re just different.

          Simplex is more of a messenger, while xmpp/matrix are more of discord alternatives.

          Also simplex works with nodes. I can host a simplex server and it will be added to the network. In matrix/xmpp if I host a server it will be a new instance, like in lemmy (if I get it right). Simplex’s approach is like tor’s approach, each server added contributes to the whole network (they arent a separate instance).

          If you check their page they have some bery good features, to me it seems like its signal, done (somewhat) right. Signal doesnt even have a proper way to migrate accounts across devices… not to mention the phone number requirement which might scare people who aren’t gonna waste time hearing my explanation as to why it’s not an issue or the fact that until recently signal would notify everyone in your contacts who had a signal account that you made an account, bruh

          There’s also this comment here that throws some shade to matrix, havent looked much into that tho.

        • something_random_tho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Each convo gets its own UUID, and the convos can be spread across different servers/companies too.

          That said the notifications don’t work consistently for me on iOS, so that’s a dealbreaker. Hopefully they fix that soon.

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    librewolf is still dependent on firefox for development, just like vivaldi is on chrome. there is no european web browser.

    • Libb@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      For FF and Chromium to, their source is open so if there ever was a need to make it fully European, it would be doable. Or did I miss something? (novice question, here)

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        in addition to the other reply, the teams working on browsers are massive. over 500 developers for each, and that’s only the core teams without external contributors. you don’t just put together a team like that in an afternoon.

      • RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The problem is that Librewolf, ungoogled chromium etc are soft forks, meaning they are completely dependent on the original projects. If for example Trump made a law banning releasing software as open source because that’s communism, Librewolf would likely cease to exist

  • CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If you want to use large language models or other generative predictive models (I refuse to call it AI) then I suggest considering self hosting those models for ultimate control of the information you provide.

  • Spaniard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Communications: Wire (what’s everyone’s opinion on that?)

    Search engine: selfhosted searxng if possible.