Oh no blaze you got banned ;(

Yes, it’s the bots that subscribe to federate the communities.

Yogthos drank the vatnik koolaid.

Amd and Intel need to eat their lunch.

It’s almost as if it was a siren call to have the plebs vote for him.

America doesn’t often follow international law, because they often get away with acting poorly.

When a country has the largest economy and the strongest military and does not have neighbours that are equal to it in power they tend swing their weight around.

Same thing can be seen with Russia, China and India.

Glory to the metric system 🫡🇫🇷

That prank is so mischievous.

Femcel: I will flatten you if you disagree with me <3

Wrong, people do not like the status quo being challenged.

People in certain places in the world do not appreciate being told to stop beating or eating dogs. They think those animal advocates are “rude”.

But apparently you do?

Well yes because I dont eat/use animal products for ethical reasons. A carnist obviously knows the least about this subject.

You’re dismissing the definition from the vegan society because it allows you to participate in reductionism. Go hang out with the flexitarians, vegetarians and the plant-based if you want to engage in the kind of conversation.

There are so many people who claim to be “vegan” who consume honey or oysters or fish for crying out loud. No wonder why the general population is so confused on what being vegan actually means.

Not to mention all the bad actors who lie about “being vegan” or that they know “someone is vegan” to push false narratives about the community in an attempt to discredit the whole movement.

For following proper definitions?

People hate vegans because they feel guilty about their actions.

Flexitarian: one whose normally meatless diet occasionally includes meat or fish.

Vegan: a person who follows the philosophy and way of living that excludes all forms of animal exploitation and cruelty for food, clothing or any other purpose.

This is why I’m going to block you for arguing in bad faith.

You do not get to bend words to suit your beliefs. Every legitimate vegan community would ban anyone who falsely claims they’re vegan. It’s always an abuse of power every time vegans moderates their communities but not when carnivore grifters do it.

The sidebar says that people should understand what veganism is before commenting and that pushing carnism is a bannable offense. This is why we have the community !debate_a_vegan@lemmy.world for these kinds of discussions.

This post you’re talking about is the majority dunking on the minority. Eating meat is not a neutral position between carnism and veganism.

Baby steps is not what veganism is about, that’s flexitarinism.

That attempt did not work. It’s like saying slaves should work in a business to save it.

Well said the majority will often want to oppress the minority.

The phrase “common sense” is flawed as the majority have been wrong about certain topics in the past like lobotomies being used to “correct problematic behaviour”.

A restaurant that serves animal products is flexitarian not vegan. Definitions should not be watered down. Anyone who advocates for the use of animal products contradicts the definition of veganism:

“Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals.”

I respectfully disagree with this policy change as debate communities have their place in allowing discourse on topics.

The US is breaking international law again