• MagneticFusion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    1 year ago

    i like how while all of this is happening, the governments do absolutely nothing to stop it. But as soon as encryption or anything that prevents them from spying comes into the play, they try their hardest to outlaw it to “protect the children”

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    Statistically speaking, that means a child gets sexually harassed on Facebook every 0.864 seconds.

  • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    When I was on facebook, many years ago, I was friends with my tween nieces. I wanted to stay a presence on their pages so that they would have someone to turn to if they had problems.

    I CANNOT FUCKING TELL YOU HOW MANY PROBLEMS WERE HAD… JFK that place is a nightmare for young girls.

  • skweetis@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love the line about "we have 30 tools for [preventing this thing that keeps happening from happening] ". It’s marketing-speak all the way down. Like, wow! Thirty tools!

  • CultHero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I fucking hate all meta platforms now. I’ve been on Facebook since the day it went public (allowing anyone to join instead of just college students) and it’s just a nazi recruitment platform now. There is not accountability for bad behaviour, in fact they reward trolls and punish people for dairing to defend themselves.

    If I’m harrassed it doesn’t go against community standards but if I defend myself I get banned for 30 days for bullying.

    It’s fucked up and it’s deliberate. I’ve actually gotten a ban for two emojis 🐓🍭 got me a ban but bigotry and hate speech are a ok. Ironically even Jewish people aren’t safe on meta platforms. Antisemitic behaviour is rampant, even way before the Gaza war so its not people who give a shit about Palestine.

  • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder how they got that 100,000 number. Does Meta see the messages sent over their platforms?

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Meta estimates about 100,000 children using Facebook and Instagram receive online sexual harassment each day, including “pictures of adult genitalia”, according to internal company documents made public late Wednesday.

    The unsealed legal filing includes several allegations against the company based on information the New Mexico attorney general’s office received from presentations by Meta employees and communications between staff.

    The filing is the latest in a lawsuit initiated by the New Mexico attorney general’s office on 5 December, which alleges Meta’s social networks have become marketplaces for child predators.

    Meta issued a statement in response to Wednesday’s filing: “We want teens to have safe, age-appropriate experiences online, and we have over 30 tools to support them and their parents.

    In a July 2020 internal Meta chat, one employee asked: “What specifically are we doing for child grooming (something I just heard about that is happening a lot on TikTok)?” According to the complaint, he received a response: “Somewhere between zero and negligible.”

    Yet, an internal 2017 email describes executive opposition to scanning Facebook Messenger for “harmful content” because it would place the service “at a competitive disadvantage vs other apps who might offer more privacy”, the lawsuit states.


    The original article contains 606 words, the summary contains 197 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s tempting to just pile on with “Meta bad” here as most of us believe that for a multitude of good reasons, but how would likely alternatives handle this better? Most of us on Lemmy are strongly in favor of encrypted messaging for example. As the article mentions, that makes monitoring by third parties impossible.

    What if we got all the kids to come to the Fediverse instead of InstaTok? Would-be abusers would most certainly follow. Will Fediverse admins moderate for child safety better than corporate social platforms? Will teenagers want to stay on tightly-moderated servers?

    I don’t think the solutions are as simple as “Meta should stop being shitty and care about the harm it enables”.

    • ABCDE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not our job to create solutions which they should have implemented years ago.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really hate this trend of downplaying valid points by saying “X bad”, as if we need to lay out the argument against X, meta in this case, once again, or else we’re just being idiots arguing blindly. Meta is bad and pointing out that this is just another reason why is fine.

    • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Will Fediverse admins moderate for child safety better than corporate social platforms?

      Sure, you just turn features off.

      Will teenagers want to stay on tightly-moderated servers?

      Maybe not, but at least we could sleep at night. Meta, on the other hand, sleeps at night on a big pile of money.