The midwife paid a fine and is barred from accessing the state’s vaccine records system.
A midwife in New York administered nearly 12,500 bogus homeopathic pellets to roughly 1,500 children in lieu of providing standard, life-saving vaccines, the New York State Department of Health reported yesterday.
Jeanette Breen, a licensed midwife who operated Baldwin Midwifery in Nassau County, began providing the oral pellets to children around the start of the 2019–2020 school year, just three months after the state eliminated non-medical exemptions for standard school immunizations. She obtained the pellets from a homeopath outside New York and sold them as a series called the “Real Immunity Homeoprophylaxis Program.”
The program falsely claimed to protect children against deadly infectious diseases covered by standard vaccination schedules, including diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (covered by the DTaP or Tdap vaccine); hepatitis B; measles, mumps and rubella (MMR vaccine); polio; chickenpox; meningococcal disease; Haemophilus influenzae disease (HiB); and pneumococcal diseases (PCV).
Homeopathy is a pseudoscience that falsely claims that medical conditions can be cured or prevented by extreme, ritualized dilutions of poisonous substances that cause the same symptoms of a particular disease or condition when administered directly. Homeopathic products are often diluted to such a point that they do not contain a single atom of the original substance. Some homeopaths claim that water molecules can have a “memory” of their contact with the substance, magically imbuing them with healing powers. Homeopathic products work no better than placebos, though if they are improperly diluted, they can be harmful and even deadly.
Why is homeopathy still allowed to be sold in 2024? It’s like I’ve taken crazy pills, non homeopathic crazy pills to be exact.
Because in certain concentrations in certain people under certain circumstances there is a non zero chance that it may have a non zero impact and isnt outright poison.
Yes the placebo effect is also in play to make people believe it does something. Sometimes even believing plain water is a wonder cure, makes it so.
It’s also funny the origins of homeopathy are that something that does nothing is better than whatever “cure” the alternative was.
Have you tried diluting your crazy pill so far there is only a 50% chance that one of the original molecules is in a sample, then drank that? Do your own crazy pill research, this is the TRUTH big crazy pill doesn’t want you to know?
Probably has something to do with religious freedoms.
I’m still asking myself how the fuck homeopathy got official recognition by the Health Department in my country. They have their own pharmacopoeia and accreditation. It’s unbelievable.
What country?
Jesus Assfucking Christ. She belongs in prison for 1,500 counts of attempted murder.
If you give someone something different from what they came to your business for regarding their health, you belong in prison.
Me reading this: Don’t be for polio…don’t be for polio…don’t be for polio…Fuck!
The others are bad enough but depriving kids of polio vaccines should have meant jail time.
Homeopathic products are often diluted to such a point that they do not contain a single atom of the original substance. Some homeopaths claim that water molecules can have a “memory” of their contact with the substance, magically imbuing them with healing powers.
lmao
The water remembers the essence of elderberries but somehow forgets all the shit it’s had in it.
Homeopaths Thoroughly Confused By Diluted Cordial.
It’s weird how stores are allowed to sell homeopathy as medicine - especially for kids. The sugar pills are right next to the real stuff at CVS!
bogus homeopathic
Wouldn’t that be a double negative? and imply it was real medicine? lol
The placebo effect is strong, so strong it can confound a double blind study. Having someone who actually listens to your medical complaint and provides sympathy can have a positive influence on recovery. Neither is “real medicine” but for a lot of people it’s supportive of the natural healing process (people usually to get better over time without intervention) and if it’s harmless that’s fine.
The problems start when people replace real medicine with alternative care and particularly for illnesses that don’t get better on their own, like cancer or vaccine preventable illness.
Go to a doctor: I got thirty seconds, you talk, nearly naked, while I read the answers of questions asked you by the CNA. Ok got it. Let me conduct a test. Done. Here is your script.
So like am I going to die? Oh you already left.
Go to a fake-doctor: take all the time you need, clearly you are terrified that something is very wrong and WebMD scared the shit out of you. I will practice active listening while you speak, afterwards I will give you a placebo that doesn’t do anything bad and a massage. Make sure to come back once a week for twenty years.
I don’t blame doctors and I want to make this clear. They are under a lot of pressure to churn out patients. The unfortunate result of the system is that fake-doctors can thrive due to having the ability to develop a bedside manner. I don’t have a solution to this problem.
A double positive and a double negative can both be an enhancer in english.
- Yeah right
- No no way
- No, absolutely not
Were the parents aware? The article says she sold them with “homeopathy” in the product name, implying the parents paid for the product and thus were aware. It also says that the state notified the parents that their children were not vaccinated, implying that the parents were not aware.
I never did trust midwifes. This isn’t the bloody 1850s. Go have a baby in the sterilized hospital surrounded by docs, nurses, advance medicine, and machines. If you want to go commune with nature go smoke a joint in the woods like the rest of us.
Patient outcomes for both parent and child are also abysmal for home midwife births vs hospital births. They should be avoided at all possible cost.
Also fuck this cunt in the article. She was informed vaccines save lives, and chose to swap it for quack bullshit.
You wanna refuse to vaccinate people? Fine, quit the healthcare sector.
You knowingly cover it up instead?
That’s biological terrorism. She and her kind should all be redacted.
I don’t usually advocate for the death penalty but in this case…
Using a midwife doesn’t mean forgoing modern medical care necessarily - this person is just a massive crank. There are certified midwives that work in hospitals.
I understand hiring a doula or midwife - if you’re about to give birth you probably need someone who can advocate for you while you’re trying to shove a human out. You have someone who knows you more personally than a doctor and has some medical training (depending pretty widely on location/certification). They’re going to be involved in more of the process than just the birth, they’re usually involved in the months before and after. I’ve heard about them being helpful post partem depression especially.
There’s an unfortunate history of pregnancy being an opportunity for a doctor to invoke harm. Look up the “husband stitch” - it’s difficult to estimate the prevalence but it’s known to happen. Behind the Bastards did a horrifying series on James Burt, a doctor who routinely modified the placement of vaginas without his patients knowledge or consent.
They can be legitimate professionals - it’s not all water births and refusing vitamin K shots.
I love how you mention an anecdote to attack the legitimacy of a profession that produces tangible results but demand I ignore anecdote for the quack profession you defend. Oh wow a doctor somewhere sometime was an asshole, that means medical science is shit and everyone should hire their random ass yoga friend to scream at doctors “she doesn’t need a C-section fetch me another pinecone so I can channel Gaia”. See? I can do what you did, you know only better.
Does a midwife have as much training as a doctor, yes or no? Do midwifes produce better patient outcomes for baby and mommy, in a measurable repeatable way? If the answer is no then have fun with your water sports when she bleeds out maybe the chanting will soothe her before the eternal blackness of a totally avoidable death.
Do midwifes produce better patient outcomes for baby and mommy, in a measurable repeatable way?
Did you do a modicum of work? Or just ask questions?
https://nursing.yale.edu/news/midwifery-review-adding-care-midwives-improves-birth-outcomes
I didn’t say medical science was shit? On the contrary, I’m a big fan. But medical science is practiced by people, and people can be bad actors. I bring up the example to point out that this is an extremely vulnerable moment and it is entirely valid that someone would want a person whose role was to advocate for them. I think your example is obviously hyperbolic, but I could see a women being very insistent on a vaginal birth and asking for that to be affirmed.
Midwives don’t have as much formal training as a doctor. CNAs, LPNs, CMAs, the majority of people who are actually performing your medical care don’t have as much formal training as a doctor. They aren’t intended to replace a doctor. They are a specialized support role - part of a team. A midwife pushing against seeing a doctor would be a red flag.
Homeopathy is a pseudoscience that falsely claims that medical conditions can be cured or prevented by extreme, ritualized dilutions of poisonous substances that cause the same symptoms of a particular disease or condition when administered directly.
I mean that part is kinda true though. Most vaccines do that. Just with viruses instead of poisons, since you can’t build an immunity to poisons afaikVaccines do not do that. Homeopathy involves diluting until what’s left is only water. The claim is that the water “remembers” what it had, which is nonsense. Vaccines are not simply water.
I quoted the part my dude. And I didn’t quote that part. Exclusively the part I quoted, and none of the rest, does mostly apply to vaccines.
The part you quoted, “extreme, ritualized dilutions”, doesn’t apply to vaccines, as was explained … uh, ahem, dude.
Ah, I misread. You are correct.
I wish to retract my snarky “dude” conclusion.
