The man told jurors he spent hours listening to far-right podcasts before breaking into the Pelosi home and attacking the then-Speaker’s husband with a hammer.
Whatever the fuck that means.
It was Steve Bannon himself engaged in a proof of concept that gamers were a ripe plumb of dissatisfied idle white men just ready to be radicalized by the right wing.
He learned this from his background and how he got rich in the first place: building World of Warcraft gold farms (seriously).
“It’s not my fault. Please don’t send me to jail for as long as I deserve for beating a sleeping old man with a hammer.”
Gamergate was something Steve Bannon had his gross fingers all over. He’s one of the most disgusting, infuriating propagandists out there… If I remember correctly he got his “start” with political manipulation in the gaming world. He recognized that you can radicalize “rootless” men who were lost in life and just playing video games to escape so he chose that vector to propagndize and create an army of gravy seals.
He literally did a fascist tour of Europe during the Trump years to push countries already flirting with far right policies to go further.
He’s one of a few people that really deserve a one way trip to the sun.
Its great that we have free speech protection for Nazis because they like totally won’t oppress anyone else’s speech when they gain power
The dumbest possible thing to be radicalized by.
Right? Gamergate is something I’ve never understood at all. Like… People try to summarize the whole thing for me and after two sentences I just blank out entirely because it’s all so weird, convoluted and dumb.
A gigantic “he-said-she-said” that somehow devolved into tons of harassment, death threats, violence and “calling someone’s boss so they’d get fired because they weren’t nice enough online” or something…
Your 1-sentence answer to understanding Gamergate has less to do with any of the people involved or a timeline of events. Gamergate, more than anything else, was an opportunity. A springboard to indoctrinate people into far right politics by playing to people’s fear of the Other, mistrust in media, and stoking anger at a perceived scandal.
If it never happened, if it wasn’t video games, it would just as well be something else. It would be music or sports or anything that people are passionate about. Right wingers were running out of steam with the Tea Party, and Gamergate was in the right place at the right time.
EDIT: Some contemporary discussion on GG actually, prophetically, supports this:
https://www.reddit.com/r/GamerGhazi/comments/2k0bpi/why_gamergate_is_a_rightwing_movement/
As someone on another forum said, the GG movement is primed to be the next young Republican demographic, and all of the pieces have been put into place to subvert the Authoritarian revolt into a rabid conservative base. So next year when all of the GGers (who remain) go from moderate liberals to Tea Party advocates, you can say you were at ground zero.
That got me thinking about my Q/MAGA following father and how both being indoctrinated into Tea Party politics as a teenage boy on top of Evangelical Christianity as well as being sucked into Gamergate and Sargon of Akkad’s whole “classical liberalism” grift for a while. I see a lot of that same outrage and ingroup-outgroup clashing being taken advantage of by Q and MAGA.
Game journos got real chummy with indie devs and everybody was fucking everybody. All objectivity was lost and it was full of corruption. Look up the gamejournopros group.
Everything you said was wrong, wow.
Everything I said was true. Just because you think it’s wrong doesn’t mean it is. Maybe do a little research outside your bubble.
My brother in Christ, I was there watching it happen. I saw the sad, misogynistic weirdos who used it as an excuse to harass women or as a way to gain a platform (ie, Ian Miles Cheong, Miles Yiannoppoulos). So miss me with that. Hell, Cheong and I used to follow each other on Twitter before his heel turn during GG. So yeah. Miss me with that.
Some people had different ideas about it but the vast majority that I saw were all about corruption in games journalism. Sure a lot of trolls got their start there too but it doesn’t mean that was the point.
The vast majority of the movement was misogynistic, but even the parts that were legitimately focused on corruption were focused on the AAA devs “paying” for preferential reviews of their garbage. That A. hasn’t stopped and B. had nothing to do with indie developers.
Yes, those are the people who used it to gain clout. That doesn’t mean that’s not how it started, though. There was a loss of objectivity in game journalism due to personal relationships, then a bunch of mysoginistic shitbags took the bag and ran as far as they could so they could gain a podium to spout their hatred.
It’s never just one thing.
Ian Miles Cheong got his start with Gamergate. That sholud tell you everything you need to know about what it was.
Sounds like it’s all you need to hear, not all there is to know. Plenty of extremists use legitimate movements or concerns to prey upon those desperate individuals who are seeking redress.
Zoe Quinn deserves to be told “you were right” by every person on the planet who ever meets them from now on.
What the fuck does videogame journalist corruption have to do with Nancy fucking Polosi?
Try reading the article.
And that’s not what gamergate was about, no matter what you tell yourself. It was a misogynistic hate campaign.
He was radicalized by Gamergate, now he will get to be spooned by Tyrone.
His next big video game challenge? Keeping the soap in his inventory.
Yeah, not a big fan of prison rape jokes, sorry.
