Whenever I hear about D&D more often than not it seems like people go to great lengths to stay in character and roleplay

This is great and makes for some very interesting stories but I tend to find myself more interested in just going on an adventure with a group of friends, solve a few puzzles win a few fights, complete a few quests etc

I’m also a big fan of character optimisation and mechanics but get the feeling that can be frowned upon by much of the community

Difficult to describe what I mean here but as an example in baldur’s gate I barely roleplay at all, my character has no personality except for the fact they make the decisions I would make, but I find that more fun, not having to worry about what my character would do and just making the decision I want to make

I realise not having a fleshed out character in D&D detracts from the immersiveness of the story because the DM can’t weave your character into the story but at least at the moment that doesn’t sound too bad to me.

Just wondering if there are people out there who run lighter roleplay campaigns

  • Nighed@sffa.community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would argue that most D&D games are roleplay light - it’s MUCH easier to just run a mechanical game than one with lots of roleplay.

    I can give you session after session of dungeon crawling, or low level story stuff, but trying to put together a campaign with good (consistent) characters with motivations and personalities is incredibly difficult.

    The reason you hear about all the roleplay heavy ones (critical role etc, or even stories from other people’s campaigns) is because they stand out as being special, exceptionally well done games.

  • grilledcheesecowboy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    You might be interested in Pathfinder Society.

    Basically they’re Pathfinder pickup games with a pre-approved set of rules run at game stores and conventions. The games tend to be focused almost exclusively on mechanics and puzzles with almost no role play.

    • flashgnash@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not that I don’t want roleplay, I’m not sure if I’ve figured it out in my own mind yet in all honesty

      Just want the roleplay not be taken too seriously if that makes any sense, characters don’t need to be too deep, breaking character for a joke isn’t frowned upon etc

      I guess what I’m really describing here is just a lightheaded campaign here aren’t I

  • snooggums@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have played different tabletop role playing games on and off for a few decades with dozens of people and only a few tried to stay in character beyond basic consistency with a character’s choices. One or two tried a voice or way of speaking, and barely kept it consistent.

    A lot of people just played themselves even if they said they were going to play a certain character concept.

  • Toes♀@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    D&D 4e was designed for you! It did away with most RP mechanics and focused heavy on dungeon crawling and perfecting character stats.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its all up to the group. Most groups I have been in did not have any particular requirements. Some folks roleplayed more than others. If a group is big on roleplaying there are plenty of ways of making a character that just does not interact much. From the silent types who just take action to dumb brutes who don’t get all this talky talk. Honestly I find most folks don’t rp all that much. If you do play by discord its so hard to keep momentum going that often rp is a bit limited. people can talk your ear off but typing your eyes out is much harder.

  • oocdc2@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    You may also want to consider other game systems that have much less emphasis on role playing and are primarily strategy-based, such as Battletech.

  • just some guy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s my group’s Sunday nights. Sprinkle in joke characters or based off characters from shows or movies here and there, and that’s how we’ve been playing together for 8y or so

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sure! I’ve run plenty of them over the years. It’s good fun.

    It can be hard to get a group together that all have the same preferences, but you’d be surprised how many people want at least an occasional “hack n slash” session, even if they don’t want it every session.

    I gotta say that I tend to prefer the more role play than roll play most of the time, even as forever DM. But I still enjoy just breaking open a random encounter chart and going ham, or pulling out my heroquest stuff for a more board game one-off session.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why play pen-and-paper games rather than computer games if you’re more interested in combat rather than roleplaying? Pen-and-paper combat is tedious and feels like work when compared to computer-game combat. I see it as a necessary evil in a roleplaying campaign; I’m not sure why someone would want it for its own sake when computer games exist.

    (Edit: just to be clear, I’m not trying to tell other people what they’re allowed to like. I love character optimization myself - I’m the kind of guy who used to be obsessed with planning my Path of Exile skill tree. I just don’t understand why some people do that sort of gaming the old-fashioned way when they could do it on a computer.)