psychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoGoogle Flat-Out Refuses to Bargain With Workers, Prompting YouTube Music Strikewww.vice.comexternal-linkmessage-square20linkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down10cross-posted to: workreform@lemmy.worldgoogle@lemmy.worldantiwork@lemmy.world
arrow-up14arrow-down1external-linkGoogle Flat-Out Refuses to Bargain With Workers, Prompting YouTube Music Strikewww.vice.compsychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square20linkfedilinkcross-posted to: workreform@lemmy.worldgoogle@lemmy.worldantiwork@lemmy.world
minus-squaredangblingus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoEasier to say than “aluminium”
minus-squaresamus12345@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years ago“Aluminum” at least has 1 less syllable. But I usually just say “foil.” What else would I be talking about in that context?
minus-squareCosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-22 years ago “Aluminum” at least has 1 less syllable. But I usually just say “foil.” What else would I be talking about in that context? a·lu·mi·num tin·foil (Sorry for the ‘ackshully’, but couldn’t resist.)
minus-squaresnugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoOne less than aluminium
minus-squareCosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-22 years agoDidn’t even realize that was a word until I looked it up. the chemical element of atomic number 13, a light silvery-gray metal. Not sure how that relates in a conversation about tinfoil hats usage but sure why not. I’m sure the composition of the devices has a significant performance impact on their effectiveness, worthy of discussion. :p
minus-squaresamus12345@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoACKSHULLY, I was referring to “aluminum” as opposed to “aluminium.”
minus-squareCosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·2 years agoThat’s not how you spelled it though in your comment.
minus-squaresamus12345@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years ago Easier to say than “aluminium” Is the comment I was replying to.
minus-squareCosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-22 years agoFair enough. I didn’t read the comment previous to yours, just your comment directly, so I thought you were referring to ‘aluminum’ versus ‘tinfoil’.
Easier to say than “aluminium”
“Aluminum” at least has 1 less syllable. But I usually just say “foil.” What else would I be talking about in that context?
a·lu·mi·num
tin·foil
(Sorry for the ‘ackshully’, but couldn’t resist.)
One less than aluminium
Didn’t even realize that was a word until I looked it up.
Not sure how that relates in a conversation about tinfoil hats usage but sure why not.
I’m sure the composition of the devices has a significant performance impact on their effectiveness, worthy of discussion. :p
ACKSHULLY, I was referring to “aluminum” as opposed to “aluminium.”
That’s not how you spelled it though in your comment.
Is the comment I was replying to.
Fair enough. I didn’t read the comment previous to yours, just your comment directly, so I thought you were referring to ‘aluminum’ versus ‘tinfoil’.