• brbposting@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Considering e.g. a thoughtful, insightful, well-researched post with a conclusion we completely disagree with and feel is likely to lead to negative outcomes - but is still a perspective that should be understood if we want to be well rounded:

    Binary up/downvotes have a really hard time of capturing what we want to see reflected as our assessment.

    Edit: blessed be thy highly-voted child comment

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      As someone from the U.S., it seems like that concept has practically disappeared from the country. The nuances of civil debate, including the acknowledgement of differing opinions as valid, don’t exist in most of our popular media (both traditional and social.) We’ve been conditioned to react to things immediately and intensely using our emotions instead. There has been a slide toward this state for decades, but it’s come to the point where a lot of people genuinely struggle with separating “thing they personally disagree with/don’t like” from “thing that shouldn’t be said/heard/shared.”

      (Not saying that’s the case with OP, just that it’s definitely a thing that’s been going on.)