Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Work Reform@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 hours agoStarbucks continues to be terriblelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1792arrow-down12
arrow-up1790arrow-down1imageStarbucks continues to be terriblelemmy.dbzer0.comSir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Work Reform@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 hours agomessage-square78fedilink
minus-squareRivalarrival@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·5 hours agoLet me translate that rhetorical question for you: Why do you believe society should allow certain businesses to remain in existence, when those businesses utilize human labor, yet do not pay enough for human laborers to subsist?
minus-squareRaptorBenn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoI don’t believe that, you’ve just attached that to my argument because you either can’t understand my point or don’t want to.
minus-squareRivalarrival@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-218 minutes ago I don’t believe that, I see. Maybe we have had a failure to communicate. What I was referring to was this: And especially Starbucks, it’s shit-work Whatever you meant by “shit-work” is what I was trying to ask you about. Why do you believe companies offering “shit-work” should be allowed to remain in business?
Let me translate that rhetorical question for you:
Why do you believe society should allow certain businesses to remain in existence, when those businesses utilize human labor, yet do not pay enough for human laborers to subsist?
I don’t believe that, you’ve just attached that to my argument because you either can’t understand my point or don’t want to.
I see. Maybe we have had a failure to communicate. What I was referring to was this:
Whatever you meant by “shit-work” is what I was trying to ask you about.
Why do you believe companies offering “shit-work” should be allowed to remain in business?