Summary

Democrats must reclaim their identity as the party of the working class to regain electoral strength.

Despite pro-labor policies under Biden, working-class voters feel disconnected, seeing Democrats as defenders of a failing system.

The party’s decline traces back to NAFTA and neoliberal economic policies that favored corporations over workers.

A generational effort to prioritize labor rights, fair wages, and economic security while addressing working-class frustrations are needed.

Without serious reform, Democrats will continue losing ground to populist alternatives.

  • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    146
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    No shit. Now convince the democratic party leadership that winning elections is more important that kissing donor ass.

    • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Their goal is never to win elections. Their only goal is to prevent leftist movements and organization from gaining positions of power. To defend these status quo.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Wouldn’t be surprised if you are in a situation where it needs to get worse before it can get better. Vote 3rd party so heavily that it kills one of the major parties. All the people that didn’t turn up vote for someone else?

    • MisterD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The best way is to bring single payer health care.

      Every other G7 nation has it

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        They tried to do that the moment they had senate supermajority with caucusing ind over a decade ago, but caucusing ind Joe Lieberman voted against it and the GOP filibustered it in 2010.

        They haven’t even had more than 50 since like 2013, they only had bare minimum to select majority leader in 2021 because of caucusing independents and VP tiebreaker.

        If you want single payer then the only way to get that is not to change the DNC, it’s to convince millions more people to vote for them or to remove Republicans.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          ACA was never going to be single payer. Lieberman played the bad guy to kill the public option, but it was pretty obvious it was only there to be bargained out in the first place.

          Single payer, on the other hand, was never even considered to be an option.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            They voted on singlepayer and it lost by Independent Joe Liebermans vote.

            You cannot blame that on the DNC.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Now convince the democratic party leadership that serving their constituents is more important that kissing donor ass.

      Convince them of that, and the winning elections thing will solve itself.

      • BadmanDan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        19 hours ago

        lol no it won’t. If I’m a Republican candidate, I can literally just say some culture war bullshit and still beat you in an election. Especially if you’re a woman or a minority.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Don’t convince national Democratic leadership of anything. They’re too disconnected and don’t care about any state they don’t live in. Run for, and take control of state Democratic parties. Start telling national leadership your terms for your state supporting or working with them.

      If enough people do that. They will change or become irrelevant.

      • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The only ones that get any level of power or influence within the party are ones that will defend the status quo. A system that’s operating as designed cannot be reformed from within.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          It’s actually a pretty low bar to clear. You can even claim a decent annual wage off campaign donations if its your only income source, so a literal unemployed homeless person could run if he got the party endorsement.

          The only concern is if the state has active politicians on the ticket that you would be competing against, such as career politicians, long time staffers, and volunteers who would be seen as more preferable. You could still fill one of those staffer, intern, and/or volunteer positions to make your voice heard as well.

            • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 day ago

              The state party has some resources here on volunteering and when the state committee meets for elections and whatnot.

              You can go here and look at your county party website as well, they’ll have more info on how to get involved/run there. I looked at a few, most of them had a way of singing up to be a committee person.

              Best of luck!

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Missouri. Not sure why you’re being downvoted for asking that. We generally even in larger metropolitan areas have a ton of offices that no one other than Republicans run for. Which is part of why this is a red state. National Democrats don’t even try to field candidates for anything but the biggest offices. Which often backfires denying them even those.

          All states need to take back their leadership and a lot of the funding from the national party. The National Party should be nothing more than a body that coordinates the state parties. Not the actual leadership itself. That’s part of the reason they seem so disconnected. Because they are

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The problem is that they see donations as the end goal and no longer give a shit if they lose.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        They don’t have to be. Present the people with policies that they want and the public will do all the work themselves.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            18 hours ago

            A motivated voter seriously engaging with their social network is worth a lot more than an ad buy. The whole ad world is trying to smuggle their advertising as the genuine thoughts of a real person and politics is acting like it’s still the age of Must See TV.

            • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              18 hours ago

              True but is there any indication of that currently working on the same level in terms of the return on the ad buy that a TV ad can produce? Ads are passive and they work.

              • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                18 hours ago

                Do they? We’ve outspent Trump in three elections now and still lost two of them. Is there any actual measure of the value of an ad for political purposes? It’s not like business where you could note an increase in sales after you run an ad campaign, there’s one single opportunity to “buy” and it’s a secret. Anything you learn in that one campaign you just have to hope still applies years later in a different environment with a different candidate.

                I’m sure they have some benefit, but the only time I’ve ever seen someone talk about political advertising was either when they were sick of seeing them or when an ad was going viral because regular people were using their social networks to share it.

                • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  Yes, they do work. Anyone who thinks marketing and advertising are ineffective on them ate just ignorant of how ads work on them.

                  If you study advertising or marketing you’ll inevitable learn about Charmin toilet paper in the USA. They ran a campaign that was irritating regarding people squeezing toilet paper rolls because they were so soft. “Don’t squeeze the Charmin” was their slogan. People hated the ad. They complained about the ad to stations but Charmin also sold a shitload of toilet paper based on this ad campaign so even irritating ads can work.

                  • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    You seem to have read the first sentence and decided you’d gotten all you need for a reply.

                  • eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 hours ago

                    Things change over time. What works on one generation may not work on the next whose minds were conditioned differently in their formative years.

                    I think propaganda still works as a concept, but Democrats are trying to brainwash people like it’s the 1960s and Republicans are on the cutting edge of lying.

                    I’d compare it to, say, the Lutheran Church vs a modern megachurch. Same core absurd claim about heaven and whatnot, but the megachurch knows how to package it for the modem gull.

          • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            And guess what the innovation in advertising this last cycle was? Cheap, to voters, text messages asking for funding. Sounds like a great time to dump the dead-weight corpos and win some elections

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Here I thought “providing the better option in a binary race” would be enough; but snowflake voters need individual attention?

      “Here. We’ll keep a traitorous felon out of office because that’s the choice” and people still preferred the felon.

      I think we need to start by apologizing to the Democrats for being stupid. Not just “oops I voted wrong” stupid, but “oops I voted for the Russian agent who’s raped everything he touches and sold every secret he probably touched too, and is now oddly hellbent on destroying a country as a favour to Russia” stupid.

      That’s a lotta stupid.