• Baggie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Anti sematic behaviour is unfortunately part of the internet and general historical data, which means it could very well be an undercurrent in training data. AIs then could exhibit subconscious biases, no matter how many times the creators tell them not to be racist.

    • Singletona082@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Nono, the theory most people hear is the one about AI taking over. I read the original post with the theory written there devolving into this big giant global conspiricy where (coded language for jewish shadow government) is profiting off of everyone because of the AI takeover.

      The idea that human contnet is getting croweded out, that part i absolutely buy.

      • Baggie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        49 minutes ago

        See I don’t follow that one, because how are they actually making money in this theory?

        In the real world the ai bullshit is just another grift that’s a giant money pit. While I recognise people that follow these kinds of theories probably don’t have critical thinking skills, I wish they would following thinking to it’s conclusion. It’s a stupid hope I know.