incompetent half-assing is rarely this morally righteous of an act too, since your one act of barely-competent-enough incompetence is transmuted into endless incompetence by becoming training data/qc feedback
incompetent half-assing is rarely this morally righteous of an act too, since your one act of barely-competent-enough incompetence is transmuted into endless incompetence by becoming training data/qc feedback
We do get what you mean (extremely condescending and reductive take, if you ask me). I was thinking rigidly along the lines of data engineering, as this is, well, a data engineering problem… There just isn’t 30% of people doing this on Google captchas, and this isn’t a “take”, just a reality of the scale and amount of people interacting with Google products. Have fun all you want, you do this, your data most likely gets thrown out, that’s all.
We’re still talking about image recognition, aren’t we? This feels like a general commentary on how Big Tech sees their customer base, which I don’t disagree with, but in my mind was just another discussion entirely…
I consider big tech’s relationship and valuing of human beings condescending and reductive, so shrugs don’t come at me I am the powerless one.
I didn’t light trust and decency on fire, excuse me if sometimes I don’t extend the grace they refuse to extend to all of us.
Damn, find me something else people are forced to do for no gain to themselves that isn’t 30% full of bullshitters, what makes people so honest and hardworking when it comes to captchas?