• Frog@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      NJ had a single use plastic bag tax. To get around it companies increased the thickness of plastic bags and gave it for free. Apparently the thickness is what separated a single use bag with a reusable one. Politicians are clowns 🤡.

      • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Politicians are clowns is what you said while it was companies skirting the spirit of the law by exploiting a loophole.

        Amazing that is your take

        • Frog@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Imagine writing laws as a job and leaving such an obvious loophole.

          Yes, politicians are clowns.

      • AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I would envision a plastic tax that is based on weight of the material created. Every ounce costs $.10.Make the producer last. Same with Styrofoam. That money could be funneled back to some green initiative.

      • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Same up in Connecticut. I have so many crappy “reusable” plastic bags from Target pickup orders during the height of the pandemic. I can’t bring myself to get rid of them because they’re “reusable”, so I use them to hold donations for the thrift store and get rid of them that way. I also use them as packing material.

        I have other, nicer bags I use when I go to shopping.

      • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        It’s supposed to be a game of cat and mouse, but right now the cat isn’t even trying. I think what’s needed is some sort of ‘living legislation’ that constantly updates to close loopholes that stakeholders find in it. Iirc this should be possible in common law systems with deliberately vague laws whose interpretation keeps getting updated by court cases.

        • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Wasn’t that the idea behing the Chevron doctrine? Leave the specifics up to experts rather than bamboozling Congresscritters about details.