Wahots@pawb.social to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-219 days agoFDA Bans Red Dye 3 in Foods, Linking It to Cancer in Rats - The New York Times (paywall free)archive.phexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkFDA Bans Red Dye 3 in Foods, Linking It to Cancer in Rats - The New York Times (paywall free)archive.phWahots@pawb.social to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-219 days agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-squareJohn Richard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·19 days agoSure it might cause cancer but they don’t have to stop using it for at least a couple more years.
minus-squareOhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·19 days agoIt’s been banned in Europe for 30 years. Can’t let cancer get in the way of profits.
minus-squareicecreamtaco@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·19 days agoFood companies can’t redesign all their recipes in one day
minus-squareJohn Richard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·19 days agoI mean 2 years is a lot of time for people to get cancer, but I see your point that companies should be allowed to give people cancer for 2 years so it doesn’t hurt their profits.
minus-squarepiecat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·19 days agoEither it’s bad enough to ban and should be immediately banned, or it isn’t really that bad and shouldn’t be banned.
Sure it might cause cancer but they don’t have to stop using it for at least a couple more years.
It’s been banned in Europe for 30 years. Can’t let cancer get in the way of profits.
Food companies can’t redesign all their recipes in one day
I mean 2 years is a lot of time for people to get cancer, but I see your point that companies should be allowed to give people cancer for 2 years so it doesn’t hurt their profits.
Either it’s bad enough to ban and should be immediately banned, or it isn’t really that bad and shouldn’t be banned.