• DaGeek247@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 days ago

    Lmao ain’t no commercial car in existence that can go 420mph. Cop saved you a ticket if you’re not an idiot about things.

      • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        No, terminal velocity is somewhere around 110mph I think. Unless you’re talking about sending it into space.

        Edit: yes I have read more about this since making the comment. Big thanks to a mediocre education decades ago for what I thought I knew.

        • Klear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Pretty sure that’s terminal velocity of a falling human. It will likely be much higher for a car.

        • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          To be fair, I did say “high enough.” Get it beyond the atmosphere and it’ll easily hit 420mph. Just know there won’t really be anything left for your insurance company to appraise.

          • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 days ago

            I caught that and I tried to acknowledge it. But I think the implied part was that vehicles won’t go that fast under their own power.

            • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 days ago

              I think the implied part was that vehicles won’t go that fast under their own power.

              Sure, that’s why what I said was funny. 😉

        • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          Terminal velocity depends on the drag profile and weight of an object. So it actually depends what shape the vehicle is and it’s mass.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            If they were going that fast, they wouldn’t be getting a simple citation that could be resolved in traffic court, that’s straight to jail levels of recklessness…

            • y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              11 days ago

              that’s faster than most helicopters, if they’ve got a long enough straight, they’re getting away lol

              • DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 days ago

                If they’ve got the gas for it.

                A Bugatti Chiron can do 440km/h. If the 100 litre tank was filled at the beginning, then the car will travel for 9 minutes at top speed before running out of gas.

                • y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  good point

                  i guess if I’ve got Bugatti money I’ve probably got money for a helicopter of my own, why the hell am I going 440kph in traffic lmao

          • DaGeek247@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            Damn, there goes my pride in my reading comprehension skills. Still pretty dang close when all you have to do is change ‘no commercially available car’ to ‘no reasonably available car’.

      • DaGeek247@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Neither, lmao. Sometimes a good discussion can be had by simply following through on silly premises.