• megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    “ We promise it’s not just jewelry for men, promise, because men don’t wear jewelry. This is just a tool, and maybe a status symbol, but definitely not in the way jewelry can be a status symbol.”

    • 5in1k@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I like to wear a watch, it’s shiny and has gold. Definitely jewelry but also I like to be able to check the time without my phone. I don’t think people are going for Timex as a status symbol though. They’re cheap watches.

    • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Wrist watches used to be women’s wear. Pocket watches were for men until WW1 when they found out that wrist mounted timepieces are super handy when you need to carry a rifle all the time and launch attacks synchronized with walking artillery barrages.

      Just like anything else it can be purely for looks or purely for function but the best stuff does both at once. A nice looking precise watch, a pen that looks and writes great, dress shoes comfortable enough to wear all day, an Italian suit with a tactical liner lol

      • moonburster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think I’d go for a pocket smartwatch since they have no need for a lot of sensors and room for a bigger battery. And yes, I do know that if you will take something out of your pocket anyway, why not just your phone? For that I have no answer, I still want one

        • warl0x@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          First half: Heh, ironic because a phone is just a bigger smart watch, especially with an always on oled.

          Second half: What would that even look like!?

          • meyotch@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            This is a replica prop from an old TV show about time travel. (Voyagers, the device was called Omni). That’s what I thought of.

  • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    There’s definitely value in not constantly being tethered to a device reminding you how many steps you’ve taken, e-mails, etc. Also I’m reminded me of a quote:

    “Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small unregarded yellow sun. Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-two million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue green planet whose ape-descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.” ― Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      ape-descended

      It’s very popular to call humans some variant of this, and while it’s correct, it also implies that humans are no longer apes. They are.

      • StephniBefni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is true, there are two kinds of animal, monkey or ape. Because if it doesn’t have a tail it’s not a monkey, even if it’s a monkey kinda shape. If it doesn’t have a tail it’s not a monkey, if it doesn’t have a tail…it’s an ape!

        Or at least that’s what I learned from my parents force feeding me nothing but VeggieTales for far too long.

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yup, that’s correct! Primates without tails are apes, and we’re a primate without a tail.

          • StephniBefni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Well what they applied the example to was a cow, citing that due to its tail out was a monkey of course lol. But yeah it does apply to primates for sure. Also a notable example is in Pokémon where you have mankey who evolves into primeape and loses their tail in the process. Of course this also kind of implies that apes are just angrier, stronger monkeys.

            Also completely unrelated to our conversation, but relevant to your username…Metriod is my absolute favorite gaming series, Metriod Prime is amazing, and I always wanted to be Samus when I grew up.

  • FrostKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Can you not simply turn that off on most smart watches? Actual question, I haven’t owned one in a while