I can see that you aren’t having a conversation in good faith, you’re not actually curious, you’re prejudiced (evident in first reply), and you’re bigotted, cannot even concider how another perspective may be valid.

So, Im going to stop replying.

I’ve taken classes like these too back in the 00’s, partner is younger with a masters, is a social worker who works for the government, and has been through more education than I have, and she has definitely been exposed to this idea in education. I just asked her and she confirmed she learned this in higher education. Who knows for sure without taking every class with every professor but I’ve provided material for you to read where people in academia admit that the idea is out there, in academic circles.

Some interpretations of CRT suggest that, within a white-dominated system, racism is primarily perpetrated by those with power and privilege, which are often associated with whiteness.

According to CRT, racism is not just about individual prejudices or biases but also about the systemic and institutionalized ways in which certain groups are marginalized and excluded. In this context, the theory suggests that people of color can also exhibit prejudiced attitudes or behaviors, but these actions do not have the same impact as those perpetrated by individuals with power and privilege.

See how simple it would be to conflate or for this fact to be implied, especially if not thuroughly dispelled?

Also, why are you so confrontational?

The people that say this just happen to be the noisiest crowd.

The idea stems from Critical Race Theory (CRT) as it attempts to understand and or explain societal power structures through racism.

CRT is taught in various college courses across many institutions in the United States. Here are some examples of colleges and universities that offer courses related to CRT:

1. Harvard University:
   • “Critical Race Theory” (Law School)
   • “Race and Racism in America” (Sociology Department)
2. University of California, Berkeley:
   • “Introduction to Critical Race Theory” (Ethnic Studies Department)
   • “Critical Race Theory and Education” (Graduate School of Education)
3. New York University (NYU):
   • “Critical Race Theory” (Law School)
   • “Race and the Law” (Law School)
4. University of Michigan:
   • “Critical Race Theory” (Law School)
   • “Introduction to Critical Race Theory” (Sociology Department)
5. Stanford University:
   • “Critical Race Theory” (Law School)
   • “Race and Racism in America” (African and African American Studies Department)
6. University of Texas at Austin:
   • “Introduction to Critical Race Theory” (Sociology Department)
   • “Critical Race Theory and Education” (College of Education)
7. Yale University:
   • “Critical Race Theory” (Law School)
   • “Race and the Law” (Law School)
8. University of Wisconsin-Madison:
   • “Introduction to Critical Race Theory” (Sociology Department)
   • “Critical Race Theory and Education” (School of Education)
9. Columbia University:
   • “Critical Race Theory” (Law School)
   • “Race and Racism in America” (Sociology Department)
10. University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA):
    • “Introduction to Critical Race Theory” (Chicana and Chicano Studies Department)
    • “Critical Race Theory and Education” (Graduate School of Education)

While it may be true that CRT and or courses built around CRT may not teach this specific detail explicitly it’s implicit and it’s even acknowledged and discussed in Education, even as just a “common misconception”. If you have a common misconception in education you have a failure to educate and people still walk out with the idea.

https://www.nas.org/blogs/article/where_did_we_get_the_idea_that_only_white_people_can_be_racist

It’s also what they seem to be teaching in college.

People say food is too expensive but they don’t buy rice and dried beans in bulk. The food that they eat, that’s easy to get, that they enjoy, is expensive. If it was a real problem they’d be switching to rice and beans.

Same with “i cant function without the internet raping me i have no choice”. You absolutely have a choice but the truth is, you don’t want it.

$time = (get-date).adddays(-30)
gci -file -filter *.pdf `
  | ? { $_.lastwritetime -gt $time } `
  | % { convert -density 300 $_.fullname $($_.fullname + ".jpg") }

🤷

Eh, Capitalism will do what it can to turn a profit, which includes things that are good for society. People are fucking dumb and they do not read ToS or EULA, they just sign up for “free” shit and get advertised to while companies track them, spy on them, etc.

Even when you tell people about their data, they don’t care. I literally have a shirt which reads “they sell your data” by the way, I take it more seriously, and I feel like a fucking nut. I mean, I feel like the only sane person but you know, if every room smells like dog shit check your shoes.

Well, can you explain your perspective then?

Most people just want to be left alone and socialism is the farthest thing from being left alone. They say there is no private property in socialism but really you become the property.

containers/

html/