Yeah, that isn’t what I am saying.

I am still talking about random people who would witness whatever the fuck someone would want to do there.

We are talking about public toilets. The “random” people are stranger going for a pee.

I was agreeing with you. I was saying that other e.g. men would walk into the toilets, so the criminal wouldn’t be alone with the victim and the criminal obviously doesn’t care about the rules. But the random e.g. men that wouldn’t enter as it is a women’s bathroom, but if it is unisex, those men would enter and would deter some crimes as there would be a witness.

Some people seem to think that public toilets need urinals and that urinals couldn’t be at e.g. the end of the toilet behind a cover, so people don’t have an accidental peek on a dick.

On entry, A sideview of the urinals and potential dicks are mandatory. If not at least 6 women see me pee against their will, I will sue the government. Look at my dick, woman!!!/s

People are just weird and can imagine that, like you don’t go out of your way to look at people change in locker rooms, you don’t go out of your way to see dicks on a public bathroom and that obviously unisex toilets would change how we build toilets.

As a man, I haven’t seen an other man’s dick on the toilet in months… Honestly I think years but I don’t want to lie.

Yeah they would want to live as other women do. They, as women, would do as other women would do and go to the unisex toilet.

There are some unisex toilets, cis and trans women have happily used these toilets.

I am interested in that direct contrast, wanna explain?

But it keeps out around 50% of the population whose presence would deter assault. People usually don’t get assaulted in a place with a lot of random witnesses.

Let me rephrase your question.

Why does a subset of women choose the women’s bathroom, instead of men’s bathroom?

Mhm I don’t know… Maybe… Just maybe… Because they are women? And they want to live their lives as what they are?

Not sure.

Where do you want to place the goal post?

We talked about comparing 2 applications. Commenter wasn’t up-to-date and implied a falsehood, I corrected it as it is important for the discussion. Then you talk about something completely else and in context, implied a falsehood, I corrected that as it is important for the discussion. And now you are talking about something completely else again.

Please express your opinion. You can do it in this thread, even if it is off-topic, I don’t care, but please stop acting like you are responding to me.

As far as I know telegram requires a phone number too.

And the conversation was about “talking to strangers without giving them your number”, not without giving signal nor telegram your number.

Signal supports username based chatting.

It was probably by being racist.

I bet if I would say “america is a democracy but it is oppressive”, they would agree, or start to express how it isn’t a democracy, because only wealthy people have a realistic shot.

People who claim shit like you can’t like the people and dislike the government in a democracy, are telling me that I can’t like my friends and love my partner. I mean e.g. I met her after I dislike her government at the time.

Sadly/fortunately(?) you are wrong.

Remember how they wanted to ban abortions, and now women who wanted the baby but have a medical emergency, might not get the medical care because doctors are afraid of accidentally “killing” the fetus.

What makes you think that they won’t fuck up the laws against trans people.

(Of course, there are better arguments against transphobia but we are talking about selfish reasons)

Nah, if they come for you in the morning,

They are coming for me in the morning, I am just too stupid to get it.

Ignoring the obvious fact that trans people are like everyone else. Any law against any group will fuck with everyone else. They wanted to ban abortions and now in some states, docs are afraid of saving your life because they might be blamed for the death of the fetus. They didn’t fuck with “women who love abortions” (as if that was real) they fucked with every pregnant woman’s life and in proxy, their friends and family’s life. If they target trans people, they are one poorly written law away to ruin your life and as they target trans people… They clearly aren’t particularly the kind of people who might would get it “right”.

Trans rights are human rights.

Yeah, but then they start “gaming”…

I just edited my comment, just no wonder you missed it.

In 2024, chatgtp was projected to use 226.8 GWh. You see, if people are “gaming” 24/7, it is quite wasteful.

Edit: just in case, it isn’t obvious. The hardware needs to be produced. The data collected. And they are scaling up. So my point was that even if you do locally sometimes a little bit of LLM, there is more energy consumed then just the energy used for that 1 prompt.

I am not necessarily got intellectual property but as long as they want to have IPs on their shit, they should respect everyone else’s. That is what is immoral.

How is it made sparsely? The training time for e.g. chatgtp 4 was 4 months. Chatgtp 3.5 was released in November 2023, chatgtp 4 was released in March 2024. How many months are between that? Oh look at that… They train their ai 24/7. For chatgtp 4 training, they consumed 7200MWh. The average American household consumes a little less than 11000kWh per year. They consumed in 1/3 of the time, 654 times the energy of the average American household. So in a year, they consume around 2000 times the electricity of an average American household. That is just training. And that is just electricity. We don’t even talk about the water. We are also ignoring that they are scaling up. So if they would which they didn’t, use the same resources to train their next models.

Edit: sidenote, in 2024, chatgtp was projected to use 226.8 GWh.

“ai bad” is obviously stupid.

Current LLM bad is very true. The method used to create is immoral, and are arguably illegal. In fact, some of the ai companies push to make what they did clearly illegal. How convenient…

And I hope you understand that using the LLM locally consuming the same amount as gaming is completely missing the point, right? The training and the required on-going training is what makes it so wasteful. That is like saying eating bananas in the winter in Sweden is not generating that much CO2 because the distance to the supermarket is not that far.

Honestly I kinda like man pages. It is a pain but it is the least painful. And compared to e.g. the PowerShell docs, I love the man pages.

Yes, the “if you don’t understand the joke” comment explains the joke. That’s the point.

Who said that? No one said that refusing to vote is doing more damage than storming the Capitol.

You quoted it. Weird starting point to gaslight people.

I like that you asked. While I don’t hold a strong opinion on it, I think you could argue that it is about consent.

I will argue more strongly than I feel because I think it helps to understand the point. (Assuming the person wearing makeup is a woman)

If you don’t know the woman, why do you care if she wears makeup and how she looks without? It seems like there isn’t a legitimate reason for it without it being a toxic reason, like “look! she isn’t prettier than me!” Vibe. Which is toxic for both people. Now it was a man who made the app. Now there is the hating of women for wearing makeup reasons but let’s ignore those. (Case: Unknown feelings of the woman)

If you know the woman and you don’t know how she looks without makeup, then that is clearly a decision made by the woman. Why do you have the right to expose her in a way that she doesn’t want to be. I mean some women don’t care if you see their tummies and others would rather die. Should you have the right to expose a woman’s tummy? (Case: Implied decision to not show herself like that)

If you know the woman and you want to argue that you have a justified interest in how she looks without makeup because she is a potential Partner (if she is a partner, you probably know already anyway). You could easily argue that you have the same legitimate reason to see her naked but obviously you wouldn’t think that it is a legitimate reason.

In other words, you shouldn’t care and it is kinda toxic to care; you don’t have consent to see them like it otherwise you would; you have no right to know.