And people have been. A counter group was made called the Raven Mission that calls out explicitly pro-Zionism and pro-genocide people and their comments.

Yes, exactly. They have a separate clause in their contract that makes it so you can’t be hired at the company you’re being contracted to until you’re most of the way through your contract (or the company has to pay the contracting agency a decent chunk of change if they really want to hire you on early).

And the noncompete is an additional document to prevent you from just ending your contract early and applying for the real position at the company without that issue.

Basically the contracting agency trying to get as much money as possible. Even while offering the most minimum of worker benefits they can legally manage.

I think you misunderstood. The contracting agency has the noncompete clause in their contract. To prevent you from being able to cancel your contract part way through and get a real job at the company you’re being contracted out to.

Or sometimes, like mine, that you can’t quit your contract early to apply for a full colleague position at the company you’re being contracted out to.

I’m not sure why they use “person”, but I’m assuming your W-2 or 1099 would have different companies

Yes, those documents list the contracting agency as the company one is working for, rather than the company one is being contracted out to.

Basically a lot of the low level jobs are contractors. And you can eventually be hired by the company as a colleague once your contract is up. The contracting agency, however, put in a noncompete clause so that the contractors can’t end their contract early in order to apply for that company’s colleague position.

Not a competitor, but the company you were working at with the contracting agency. Basically trying to stop being a contractor and trying to be hired directly as a colleague.

Would this also apply to a contracting agency that has a noncompete document that had to be signed by their contractor employees?

The noncompete is so that the contracting employee can’t end the contract early and then be hired directly by the company they were being contracted to. At least not for at least a year after ending the contract unless the length of the contract was completed in full.

Edited for clarity

It’s not backed by actual money. It’s practically an “IOU” bond. It would be ridiculous if any judge accepted it.

I mean, it’s better than them using land lines like they used to. And, if they did it properly, then their calls should have caller ID saying it’s the polling service. Also, they should leave a message to get called back.

I don’t know if they did any of that, but it would be the right way to do it.

Did you have a point? That’s a standard sample size for polls.

No, it’s for the prior year. A lot of awards are named that way.

Generally true, yes. In most cases, the leftists using that sort of terminology are tankies, meaning they are explicitly pro-authoritarian. They just want the dictators to be communists (or claimed communists) rather than capitalists (despite said dictatorial communism usually being about seizing all the money for themselves anyways and often results in full on capitalism regardless, China is a great example).

So you don’t even need the word replacement thought experiment. Tankies are openly authoritarian.

according to a 10-page report recently released by the staff of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee’s Democratic majority

Unfortunately, I’m not sure if a report from this group is going to result in anything. We need something with more teeth.

Really makes me wonder what the meaning behind Lavender is in this context. There could quite easily be some horrific intention behind using that specific word in correlation to this murder system.

Couldn’t you use that same claim to say that multiple known genocides weren’t because the populations are higher now? Heck, I see morons use the same argument to claim China isn’t committing genocide because the Uighur population is higher now.

The fallacious “but the population is higher” argument is an idiotic attempt to whitewash genocide.

This painterly style actually helps assuage any minor detail errors, because the style is less line detailed inherently.

He seems to specifically be gunning for the demographic of both right and left wing people that support pseudoscience nonsense. All the anti-vaxxers, for example. It’s certainly entirely possible he’d steal more voters from Trump than from Biden.

I thought that was Jr’s goal? He seems to be chumming up with right wing conspiracies pretty well.

Apologies for actually knowing the history of the subject. I’ve had these debates with misinformed people on subject regarding Clinton, Biden, and so many others going back years. For some reason, far left people actively fall for made up right wing BS claims about Democrats.