I like to ask a variety of questions, sometimes silly, serious, and/or strange. Never asking in an attempt to pester or “just asking questions” stuff.
I’m generally curious and/or trying to get a sense of people’s views.
Some talk as if more attention & engagement regarding negative subjects/issues is normal or how people’s brains work, so I’m curious about studies into the other angle on this.
That is, to what degree people may be drawn to and discuss more positive subjects.
Say articles on scientific research progress, effective disease prevention/mitigation, successful restoration projects of environments on the brink or of historical buildings/artifacts, etc.
Subjects like this related to efforts to help, maintain, and/or improve matters.
Are shitposts still shitposts if they’re in order?
u kitten me right meow?
Where do you tap for the comment reflex?
Do you also cheer?
For what it’s worth, I hadn’t seen that article before, so I was honestly curious about more up to date info on the situation since what I’d last seen.
About 38 minutes in (after scrubbing through to find it, please podcasters include transcripts) I think I found what you were thinking of. However it’s one of the other people that uses the platform mentioning something they’d seen suggesting what OP mentioned, without saying where they saw it.
Inb4 “Substack Nazis boo Nazis Nazis Nazis.” That is incorrect. There were only like 3 neo-Nazis, with about 10 followers apiece, but anyway they kicked them all out some time back now, because the entire internet was yelling at them.
Do you have sources for these claims?
Is in the bathroom a likelihood limbo?
Do you also keep an entrometer around to help guide your activity?
Is it possible to know whether you have without knowing all other preceding thoughts?
That addresses a slightly different question. Supposing people know of the free stuff, why isn’t it discussed as much?
Have you tried using your subscribed feed, other custom feeds, and interfaces that enable keyword filtering?
Let’s say ethically better then, to be more specific and explicit. Although, if we want to talk rock bottom ethically, I think we’d have to go darkweb, no?
Good points! Although I feel like I may be out of the loop on some of the discussion/mention of archive.org stuff, which likely speaks to me being out of it more broadly regarding discussions of other related materials.
Kind of surprised there aren’t more comments along these lines. This was floating around the back of my head as much as some of the other responses.
Yeah, shouldn’t it be at least thirty minutes?