Police are investigating a virtual sexual assault of a girl’s avatar, the chair of the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners has said.

Donna Jones said she had learned that a complaint was made in 2023, triggering a police inquiry.

The virtual incident did not result in physical harm but caused “psychological trauma”, the Daily Mail has reported a source as saying. Police chiefs have called on platforms to do more to protect their users.

The impact of the attack on the girl’s avatar was said to be heightened because of the immersive nature of the VR experience.

  • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe when an article says “The daily mail jas reported” we should completely ignore it until a better paper reports on it. Everything coming from the daily mail should be considered a lie.

  • trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Are you fucking kidding me?

    They took cops off of real cases to work a VIRTUAL ASSAULT in a video game. (just harassment, not assault btw)

    JFC I hope we fucking get nuked soon. We don’t deserve to live.

  • whaleross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It sounds ridiculous that they assaulted an avatar. I think it is the wrong take. The avatar is just the medium. The target was obviously the person behind the avatar. It’s like saying that threats over text message is assaulting her phone.

  • MYCOOLNEJM@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    In a game?? I kinda understand harrasment over the phone or messages or whatever, but in the game? Just change servers or fucking turn off your pc, lmao. Games are not a real place

    • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Over the phone?? Just change phone numbers or hang up your phone. You aren’t even in the same place.

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        These are not the same things, if you’re afraid of being stalked that can happen regardless of how you interact online.

        This isn’t real SA, this is a perversion of the law.

        • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re not wrong, but the whole point of the article was basically “this is fucked up and something should be done about it. Can we use current laws to address it or do we need new ones?”

          Helping to prevent people being harassed online is a good thing and doesn’t take away from the need to prevent it offline nor does it somehow invalidate people that have been assaulted.

          My original tongue in cheek comment was in response to the victim-blamey comments acting like “it’s online, so it doesn’t count”.

          • Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m gonna try to level with you, and I need you to really pay attention to the words I use because I’m not insinuating anything other than what I’m saying.

            I’ve seen VR chat. I know how online rooms like that work. If the person who was “SA’d” mistakenly clicked on a room that was far more lewd than what they were looking for, that’s on them. Ignorance is not a defense, and this is completely assuming that the “victim” was unaware of what they were doing when they entered the room.

            There’s not a single piece of text suggesting that the “assault” or “harassment” continued offline.

            This does not need a law. The only realistic thing to be done is to make sure rooms where stuff like this is prominent give a warning before joining. That is the only acceptable response, there is no reason for law to step in.

            • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              So it is the literal child’s fault for accidentally joining a “lewd” vr chat room…? The girl was under 16 in the article. If the VR chat service is setup so that literal children can get into sexually aggressive chat rooms completely unaware and by accident, I do believe there are a few laws being broken there.

  • Kalkaline @leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t make up my mind on this one. On one hand we probably should make some rules etiquette and laws regarding VR, but on the other hand I made it through the Halo series just fine and was able to separate myself from what those people did to my corpse.

  • pineapplelover@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s harassment. The game or platform should ban or punish the user. This should be protected under free speech. It’s still disgusting though.

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      why would sexually harassing children fall under free speech? I agree with you that it’s not assault, but even in the absence of assault this behavior wouldn’t be protected speech in real life and it shouldn’t be protected speech online

      • pineapplelover@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s legally protected speech. In real life, you would get the shit knocked out of you, and rightfully so. In online, the most they can do is virtually beat them up or ban from the servers.

        Edit: it depends on the severity of it too iirc. Saying “nice tits” isn’t as severe as “I’m going to rape the shit out of you”

  • Wanderer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What a joke.

    Real crimes are being compared to vr “crimes”. Next will be thought crimes.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    [the victim] suffered psychological trauma “similar to that of someone who has been physically raped”.

    No she didn’t. I’m sure it wasn’t a pleasant experience, but let’s not over exaggerate the situation.

  • Mandy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Put her into a halo or cod lobby, show her a glimpse of what actuality harrasment let alone assault looks like.

    If this woman actually thinks this was sexual assault than she’s lucky to have never had been an actual victim.