• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Necessary to protect people with weak immune systems, certainly. But we rarely get better than 60% of the population flu vaxed. It is still vital to deter higher instances of hospitalization and to blunt the rate of spread.

      • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        There are people who have genuine medical reasons to not take vaccines (e.g. an allergy to a common ingredient) or who are so immunocompromised that a vaccine won’t keep them alive, and they rely on other people getting vaccinated to avoid dying. It’s not just antivaxers who antivaxers kill.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          it’s not just antivaxers who antivaxers kill.

          Reminded of the family whose kid died of measles saying “Our other kids survived, so it was fine”.

          That young child wasn’t the one who had been deluded with misinformation.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Selection bias. All the survivors will say “See! We didn’t need the Fauchi Ouchie!” while all the dead won’t say anything.

        I’ve straight up been at an event where a speaker asked “Raise your hand if you’ve died because you didn’t get vaccinated! Nobody? That’s what I thought.”

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yes, but we’re slowly evolving away the dumbest and most dangerous of the population.

          In the past we sent them running eagerly into the meat grinder of war.

          Now they’re building up like cord wood, and starting to smolder.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            we’re slowly evolving away the dumbest and most dangerous of the population

            Do you believe that exposure to misinformation is a consequence of genetics? Like, people are just born with an ear uniquely tuned to anti-vax radio, television, and social media?

            Now they’re building up like cord wood, and starting to smolder.

            “RFK Jr is getting his eugenics backwards” is one hell of a take.

            • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              I believe vulnerability to misinformation is an effect of genetics, and this puts pressure on those genes to go extinct as they are not suited for survival.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                I believe vulnerability to misinformation is an effect of genetics

                :-/

                And you came to this conclusion… genetically?