cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/40228347

The Supreme Court of Canada has struck down a Ford government law that restricted political advertising by third parties, such as unions, in the year ahead of a scheduled election campaign.

The top court ruled in a 5-4 decision that the law allowed for political parties’ ads to “drown out” those of third-party groups, infringing on citizens’ right to meaningfully participate in the democratic process.

“The information available to voters in Ontario in the year before an election must include the interests, voices and views of different citizens and parties,” reads the majority decision written by Justice Andromache Karakatsanis.

  • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would argue that if you don’t like the system you should work to change the system and ensure that all Political advertisements must make available who paid for it. Which to my knowledge is already a thing in Canada.

      • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Is it? Because we seem to be highly dependent on investagative journalists for that sort of thing.

        Who use access to information requests to get information for their investigations. Which you, as a citizen, can also make in order to obtain aforementioned information.

        If you want the information go and get it instead of being highly dependent on others to tell you what the truth is.

        • uhmbah@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Search “Canada access to information broken” to understand previous comments…

          • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Search “Canada access to information broken” to understand previous comments…

            Search “Canada access to information” to find the portal to make a request to access information and find that it is functional. Which is the opposite of “broken”.

            • uhmbah@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Ah, I see. It’s not about understanding. You just want to debate.

              No thanks.

              • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Ah, I see. It’s not about understanding. You just want to debate.

                No thanks.

                This isn’t, and was never, a debate.

                You are just wrong. Take the L and walk away.

                • uhmbah@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Right. You avoid doing the research. Tell me I’m wrong. Then tell me I’m a loser.

                  Well, when I throw the L back at you, it means “lazy troll”.

                  Edit: LOL then they double down on the trolling…

                  • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Right. You avoid doing the research.

                    I haven’t avoided doing any research. I am not going to waste my time demonstrating to you why you are wrong.

                    If the system was broken journalists wouldn’t be able to access the information you say is impossible to obtain because the “system is broken” you absolute genius.

                    Tell me I’m wrong. Then tell me I’m a loser.

                    You are wrong, I never called you a loser, but I won’t disagree with your choice of words to describe yourself.

                    Well, when I throw the L back at you, it means “lazy troll”.

                    Projection at its best.

                    Go upstairs and cry to your mom about it.