Because AP News and Reuters are two of the most politically neutral sources that exist.
Exactly. So if they would have no problems calling Trump a fascist if they believed he were one. Because they report FACTS and not OPINION. So if Trump being a fascist were a fact, they’d say it.
I’ll entertain your bad faith argument once more and then I’m done:
Reuters and AP don’t need to call him a fascist. He already is one by his actions. Just like they don’t need to tell us a non-profit is a liberal organization when reporting on their efforts.
Because AP News and Reuters are two of the most politically neutral sources that exist.
Their not calling Trump a fascists is not the standard used to validate truth. Trump is a fascist by definition. This is not up for debate.
Exactly. So if they would have no problems calling Trump a fascist if they believed he were one. Because they report FACTS and not OPINION. So if Trump being a fascist were a fact, they’d say it.
I’ll entertain your bad faith argument once more and then I’m done:
Reuters and AP don’t need to call him a fascist. He already is one by his actions. Just like they don’t need to tell us a non-profit is a liberal organization when reporting on their efforts.
They are by their actions.