You didn’t read my comment, did you? I mentioned in my comment, that society holds girls and women to higher standards, and it’s effects on performance. Which is the opposite of pandering.
Oh no, you think there’s scientific evidence therefore it’s objectively true.
“Scientific evidence” has never been wrong before or distorted to serve a certain goal. “Scientific evidence” never recommended lobotomies for women, or suggested that homosexuality is a mental disorder. If it did, then anyone who disagreed with it would be delusional by your “standards.”
Don’t try to conflate soft sciences with hard sciences, it only makes you look moronic.
You didn’t read my comment, did you? I mentioned in my comment, that society holds girls and women to higher standards, and it’s effects on performance. Which is the opposite of pandering.
Uhh…
Yeah, this is what I mean by bending over backwards to enable their delusions. The problem has gotten so bad we don’t even realize it’s there.
What are you talking about?
If you don’t want to believe something, you’ll find ways to never believe it.
I’m not answering your question. I’m talking about you, specifically.
Except there is scientific evidence that women are held to higher standards. You’re the delusional one here.
Oh no, you think there’s scientific evidence therefore it’s objectively true.
“Scientific evidence” has never been wrong before or distorted to serve a certain goal. “Scientific evidence” never recommended lobotomies for women, or suggested that homosexuality is a mental disorder. If it did, then anyone who disagreed with it would be delusional by your “standards.”
Don’t try to conflate soft sciences with hard sciences, it only makes you look moronic.