• EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I want a clean, advanced, well designed desktop and Im okay with redoing my work flow

      Use Gnome

      Gnome is cool but can it be slightly more Windows?

      Use Cosmic (PopOS)

      I want lots of customization, advanced features, and a traditional windows desktop metaphor

      Use KDE

      I want Windows and don’t really care about customization

      Use Cinnamon

      Dude the Windows 9x look was fucking dope

      Use Mate

      Im installing this on a potato

      Use XFCE

      • Emerald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Just try out multiple desktops in a live environment and see what you like before you commit. In fact, I recommend people to use a linux live session for several weeks or months before switching, just to get used to it.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Gnome is an opinionated desktop environment and that turns some people off. But it’s bold enough to make some design decisions and have a limited scope. KDE tries to be another Windows alternative.

      Of course, you could go with a tiling window manager but my vote goes to Gnome. I’ve had a very smooth experience on Gnome for the last couple years.

      • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah, Gnome is like the Apple of the Linux world. The devs have the same kind of “we know better than you do” mentality towards design. The issue tracker is a lot of “hey the OS won’t let me do [edge-case scenario that an OS should be able to do, but which most users won’t bother with]” followed by the devs going “Gnome isn’t designed to support [edge-case scenario]. Bug report closed.” Like the devs have a very “it’s not a bug; It’s a feature” mentality, and anyone who runs into that bug must be using the OS “wrong”.

        • Emerald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          we know better than you do” mentality towards design

          And I agree with them. I think people should pick whatever desktop environment needs the least amount of customization for their needs. Keep it simple. If Gnome works out of the box, use it. If KDE works out of the box, use it.

          • EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            This is Gnomes biggest advantage to be honest. They have a singular vision of how they want their product to work and they aren’t concerned with edge uses.

            I enjoy elements of so many DEs but I keep coming back to gnome because it’s just so well executed over the others.

    • mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      IMO:

      • want to show off? i3wm with gaps and rofi for menu launcher. Add it some transparency effects too.

      • want the MacOS style? Gnome. Default on a lot of distros.

      • want something stable? XFCE. Install and forget.