• meeeeetch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      The money they paid was so that their parents and grandparents had a little something going into retirement.

        • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          They’re paid out according to their contributions. But they’re paid with money current workers are paying in. It is technically a ponzi, but was designed to be sustainable instead of promising reckless profits.

          • Yeller_king@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            It’s technically not a ponzi, it’s just a standard pay-as-you-go system which requires some sort of growth in revenues (such as population growth or changes in taxation) to be sustainable.

            A ponzi scheme is fraud that can never pay out what it promised.

            • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              It can also be sustainable if the surplus during population growth are invested and not spent.

              Somehow with these systems governments are very silent when they can skim off the top because more people are paying in and they can use that money to patch other holes in the budget, but they somehow become very critical of the system once that money would need to be paid back from the budget.

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Exactly. It’s a system that works almost entirely as a pay-as-you-go system, with each generation paying for the retirement of their elders.