with bonus threat of increasing tariffs if any retaliation…

Charge US $30B per month for NORAD access. If Russia can strike Permean basin with nuclear ICBM then that can help their negotiations with ending war on Ukraine. Fund UBI based on NORAD fee.

Eliminate tariffs on China. Sanctions on Russia. US industry that says it will make long term expansion investments in US to cut off Canadian supplies, gets immediate China contracts in response. Or make comensurate “lease fee” for NORAD higher.

Fentanyl and immigration is complete BS. This is a declaration of war based on manufacturing a false “national emergency” pretext. Any response that doesn’t treat it as a war declaration by US is pathethic weakness and politician/Canadian treason to their CIA masters.

Make the US beg to treat Canada much better than it was treated before these tariff declarations. USA collapse is necessary for Canada to prevail. Not begging to let Trump declare you a sufficient sycophantic bitch, which won’t happen.

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The turd thinks the US are needed by everyone, but the truth is the world can and will live without them. What he’s not asking himself (because he’s afraid of the answer or simply too stupid to realize) is if the US can live without the world. And the answer is no. But he’ll get there in due time.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      With a US war declaration, Canada needs to join rest of world aggressively. Eliminating US empire dictated sanctions. NORAD is essential to US global extortion. The only withdrawal to US’s declaration of war comes with just “flirting” with US national security diminishment, and freedom from colonization.

      Outcompete Mexico on Fentanyl, with a mission to cut Heroin with it for purposes of killing US addicts as a Canadian government program is a better response to end the war than appeasement. No visas for Iran IRGC soldiers while tariffs apply.

      • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Outcompete Mexico on Fentanyl, with a mission to cut Heroin with it for purposes of killing US addicts as a Canadian government program is a better response to end the war than appeasement.

        That’s fucked up and won’t move the needle at all, you’re just doing the fascists work for them. They’d probably like it if you would kill off our drug addicts.

        The lowest of American society didn’t vote for this… they likely didn’t vote at all. Aim at the top. Shut off the ability of rich Americans to enter your country. No more ski vacations. Seize American owned properties and redistribute to your own people (with the option for Americans to renounce citizenship and gain Canadian and keep their property).

        • humanspiral@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s fucked up and won’t move the needle at all, you’re just doing the fascists work for them. They’d probably like it if you would kill off our drug addicts.

          well then why is current small Canadian fentanyl smuggling a problem? Killing drug addicts accidentally is the only downside of Hospital preferred opiate.

          It’s not so much that killing as many Americans with fentanyl contamination is going to win friends, but that there is no possible appeasement to Trump coercion for our sovereignty.

          • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            It’s not a big problem, it’s lies told by trump to rile up his base.

            You want to meet the moment? Shut off our power. Trust me, that will do it. That will fuck everyone over especially his supporters.

            Edit - I thought this guy was your resident crackhead leader but apparently it’s his brother (sorry I’m dumb American). He’s onto something here: https://www.politico.com/news/2024/12/11/ontario-premier-threatens-cut-off-energy-supply-us-00193895

            • Someone@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              The guy you’re replying to is lemmy.ca’s resident Russian shill. When you recontextualize it makes a lot more sense.

              • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I have a hard time with anyone being called a Russian shill, or a Chinese shill, or whatever. I’m not Canadian and don’t spend much time in this part of lemmy, but I like hearing views from others even if they’re ones I disagree with.

  • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    American here. If you want to hurt us, shut off our power. You supply oil, natural gas, and hydroelectric to multiple states including my own. If you shut off Vermonts hydroelectric via hydro Quebec during winter we’d be completely fucked. I’m kinda hoping you do so we have a reason to secede and potentially join you as a province if you’d allow it. Fuck America.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I prefer “double” export tariffs to shutoffs. Electricity 50%, and oil 20%. split between federal and provinces. Stuff like OJ and Bourbon, 50%+ tariffs instead of blocking imports.

      Absolutely, soliciting US states to join confederation as a province is something that should be open, official policy, now. You/we can “dress it up” as US constitutional convention (normally 75% of states call for, but 10 provinces too) for exploration of 10 new states joining, or dividing “the union” into Canada and US.

      • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’m not sure I’m following you on the constitutional convention. Do Canadians have their own version of that? In America it will never happen, we wouldn’t be able to get whatever the legal majority (2/3?) is to do anything. I’m kind of hoping that most Americans are so dumb they don’t even know we’re a state, and we’re so small and economically unimportant that if we left they wouldn’t even notice.

        I’ve legit been on the phone with some customer service rep from some other part of the country and they asked me if vermont was a country and where in the world it is. I mean we were… before we became the 14th state.

        • humanspiral@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Constitutional convention is a tough ask that requires 2/3 of both congressional houses to question their rule even if the states they represent would want one. But state secession movements “dressing up” their desires into a request for one, has no good reasons to object to one, especially if default is that 75% of states must agree to changes.

          • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I think we should do it at the state level - democratic vote - and then if the response is leave we just stop paying the feds taxes and kick them off our land. What are they gonna do, invade us for our maple syrup? We invented guerrilla warfare and were heavily armed and know the mountains better than y’all queda does. And we’re accustomed to winter. The southerners wouldn’t stand a chance.

            • humanspiral@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I think we should do it at the state level - democratic vote - and then if the response is leave we just stop paying the feds taxes and kick them off our land.

              Yes. This approach is good. “Pay your federal taxes to our state instead, and we will negotiate appropriate relationship/independence from Trump/federal government.” California facing extortion over federal relief on forest/city fires, is reason for them to never pay federal taxes again, to support Florida unconditionally year after year, never mind, red state tax parasitism in general.

              • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Yeah. It would be a very risky big leap, but I think some blue states would be interested. Vermont went overwhelmingly for Harris, and we have an independent streak and history of our own. But other blue states would be harder - California and New York seem bright blue but they aren’t - the cities are and the rural areas are not. Vermont receives more federal tax money than we pay, not as much as the red welfare states but a considerable amount. I think New England as a whole would be interested but New Hampshire would be a wildcard. It could inflame a neighbor against neighbor civil war… people stupidly think a second civil war would have clear battle lines like the first. No way.

                The biggest risk besides outright hot war would be foreign interference outside of Canada and the US. The US has made a ton of enemies with our foreign policy, and with us in obvious disunion they could start arming sides like we have done abroad. Or straight up invade. Or go after their own geopolitical aims closer to home (which I care less about, I’m tired of being the worlds police that few ever asked for).

                One of the benefits is the US government hasn’t outright won a war since ww2 and the Canadians are formidable fighters in their own right. But a hot war should be avoided at all costs, it would be brutal. Many millions would die, if not in outright war in disease and starvation.

                And what about the billionaires? Somebody needs to render them useless in the process. Otherwise they’ll just reign the rubble.

                • humanspiral@lemmy.caOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  the cities are and the rural areas are not

                  Same for all of US. Proper secession would involve cities independently deciding, and then their surrounding rural areas deciding after. State “dictatorship”/electoral corruption is not any better than Federal corruption. There can never be freedom if divorce is forbidden.

                  The biggest risk besides outright hot war would be foreign interference outside of Canada and the US.

                  Foreign interference in Canada is exclusively US and Israel, with “scandals over foreign interference” without much evidence against countries that could force US/Israel to pay more to fix elections. Russian interference in US/Canada is often accused, but it is to foster divisiveness, to the glee of right wing parties seizing on the hatred manufactured, and repeating all of it. There is no “Buy Russian stuff and love Russia party”, and the foreign interference bs can very well be right wing parties contracting cheap eastern european labour.

                  Canadians are formidable fighters in their own right. But a hot war should be avoided at all costs, it would be brutal. Many millions would die, if not in outright war in disease and starvation.

                  How tough Canadians are on a 5 on 5 hockey rink doesn’t matter. Canada would need to have/ally nuclear strikes on US. A single one would collapse US economy. Without that willingness, or without absorbing individual states, then Canada might as well surrender now.