• Alenalda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    my anger is that even if the tariffs go away at some point, its not like the price of anything will go down. did the coronavirus teach us nothing?

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      Ah, it’s one of those yenius business deals one gets from a pants grab. Makes sense he’d pivot that way, it’s right on brand.

      But my president going the extra mile for all people is also right on brand. I hope her Mexico Embraces You program goes well for all those being deported. They should consider finding themselves a decent living here in Mexico if they can.

    • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      36 minutes ago

      So he got what he wanted? Plan worked I guess. Mexico and Colombia folded. Will Canada be next one?

      What were people expecting? Let’s compare numbers here. So according to various US dot GOV websites (you can google and get the numbers) I have obtain some numbers and round off for simple comparison.

      Mexico exports about $490 billion or nearly 80% of their goods the the US.

      In the meantime the US export about $360 billion or about <13% of total US exports (based on $3 trillion total export).

      Obviously they would fold. Do you know how many south american countries would love to step into Mexico’s place?

      I don’t know what the end game is but propping up Canada for a fight they can’t win is not the answer, they have numbers the same as Mexico (77% export volume to US making up 12% of total US imports).

      Up to you to make your own conjecture.

    • theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The pic is still very accurate! Tariffs are paid by the buyers and ultimately passed down to the customer! Canada will probably largely shift its imports and exports to untaxed countries, funny since it will likely be china!

      It is also funny since one of his main campaigning point was to deal with the living expenses crisis and he is going to deal with that by raising prices a minimum of 10% plus whatever the comps throw on it, taking advantage of the price raise

    • wieson@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      10 hours ago

      A hypothetical:

      Let’s say, I want to further animal wellbeing and pass a law, that every pig has to have X amount of space. Now, all my farmers are at a global market disadvantage. Consequently, they will close shop, I will import pork from other unregulated countries. The pigs are still cramped somewhere else, I have destroyed my farming sector and my food security.

      That’s why I can support some tariffs for essentials industries

      • mpa92643@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Strategic tariffs can be useful for lots of reasons. Protecting a culturally important industry, supporting certain values in that industry that aren’t respected in other countries, maintaining an industry that is important to national security (e.g., domestic steel production) that would be difficult to ramp up in an emergency if the domestic industry collapses in the face of foreign competition.

        The inherent tradeoff is that there will be retaliation by the tariff recipient on some other industry in your country; you basically accept a detriment for one domestic industry to gain a benefit for another.

        But blanket tariffs are just stupid. There are lots of industries for which it will never be cheaper to produce locally than in low-wage countries in East or Southeast Asia and that are the kinds of jobs most industrialized nation workers just aren’t interested in doing. Companies will simply pass that tariff onto consumers instead of investing massive capital and spending much more on labor to relocate domestically.

        People will buy less of everything because it’s suddenly way more expensive. Companies will sell less and have to lay people off. Blanket tariffs are effectively a regressive tax increase that directly impacts economic growth.

      • Lupus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        That’s one point, but it’s also a competitive measure. Australia has conditions that make them more competitive in things like dairy farming, wide empty and cheap land for example, that can sustain way bigger herds than most European farms, which allows them to sell the produce cheaper and still have a margin. Without some sort of regulatory measures this would ruin smaller dairy farmers in europe, because they have little to no way to compete with those prices.

        Also those tariffs are a bargaining chip in the EU-AUS free trade negotiations at the moment.

        Tariffs can be a very good tool to regulate prices or protect certain sectors that can’t compete the same way as outside powers in a global economy. BUT there has to be a fine strategy to it, otherwise you’re just kicking of trade wars.

        • ms.lane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          59 minutes ago

          That’s one point, but it’s also a competitive measure. Australia has conditions that make them more competitive in things like dairy farming, wide empty and cheap land for example, that can sustain way bigger herds than most European farms, which allows them to sell the produce cheaper and still have a margin. Without some sort of regulatory measures this would ruin smaller dairy farmers in europe, because they have little to no way to compete with those prices.

          How does that not apply in the same way that US is seeking here against China with manufacturing?

          Why is it OK for Europe to protect their jobs but NOT OK for US to protect their jobs? What makes Europe so special?

          • Lupus@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 minutes ago

            How does that not apply in the same way that US is seeking here against China with manufacturing?

            Why is it OK for Europe to protect their jobs but NOT OK for US to protect their jobs? What makes Europe so special?

            I am not informed enough to speak on that, I didn’t imply anything in my comment that would suggest I think that one way or the other.

            The only thing I can say about that is, that with those tariffs the US is violating free trade agreements that were negotiated by the Trump administration themselves during his last presidency specifically with Canada and Mexico.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Why any tariffs indeed.

      Either cooperatives on a relation of trust and mutual ethics. Or don’t work together at all.

      The 1% doesn’t care about nations, that fact that it will just cost a little extra to fund their projects in some areas is just a game of monopoly to them.