moe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoX expands lawsuit over advertiser ‘boycott’ to include Lego, Nestlé, Pinterest, and others | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square162fedilinkarrow-up1715arrow-down122
arrow-up1693arrow-down1external-linkX expands lawsuit over advertiser ‘boycott’ to include Lego, Nestlé, Pinterest, and others | TechCrunchtechcrunch.commoe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square162fedilink
minus-squareRhaedas@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up79·2 days agoNot if there’s fewer there to see ads. They’re still a business with a bottom line, even if what they do is terrible.
minus-squareAnivia@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 hours ago Not if there’s fewer there to see ads But you usually pay per click or impression, not a flat rate. So that alone shouldn’t be a reason for them to stop advertising there
minus-squaredanc4498@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoLess of a boycott and more of a logical business decision.
Not if there’s fewer there to see ads. They’re still a business with a bottom line, even if what they do is terrible.
But you usually pay per click or impression, not a flat rate. So that alone shouldn’t be a reason for them to stop advertising there
Yea, fair point.
Less of a boycott and more of a logical business decision.