Summary

Mark Carney, frontrunner for Canadian Liberal Party leadership and potential prime minister, stated Canada will stand up to a bully after Trump imposed 25% tariffs on Canadian imports.

Carney vowed to retaliate by matching the US tariffs dollar for dollar, asserting Canada would not cave in despite mounting pressure.

He criticized Trump for undermining trade agreements, warning that the tariffs would damage the US global reputation and economic stability.

Outgoing Prime Minister Trudeau promised a forceful, immediate response, emphasizing unity as Canada defends its economic interests, ensuring national prosperity.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    18 hours ago

    All of these guys are stupid really. It would’ve made sense for Pollievre to not push for no confidence and just wait until October where he’d be up against Trudeau and probably win. But he got his way and Trudeau resigned. Now is he going to force an election in the winter where he’s running against a stronger candidate? Last election the Liberals took a big hit in the polls from calling an unscheduled election. How many points will Pollievre lose if he makes a winter election happen?

    Pollievre went all-in on US style politics and it’s wearing thin. Running endless ads outside of a campaign has made people sick and tired of him. When his US brethren tank the economy people might question whether being “anti-woke” is sound economic policy.

    It’s still his election to lose, but it seems he’s doing everything possible to make that happen.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      17 hours ago

      His other big problem is that he’s just not very likeable. People hate Trudeau, so they were willing to side with anyone who would get him out. But with Trudeau gone voters are now faced with the fact that they really don’t much like Pollievre either.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        But, they don’t like Freeland either. And Jagmeet Singh has proven to be pretty useless.

        It’s still really likely that the conservatives would win in a landslide. But, at least now their rhetoric has to switch from copying the US to opposing the US.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          That likelihood has dropped a lot. Liberals are seeing a significant uptick in recent polls, and Carney has a very positive approval rating (+13 was the latest number I saw). He’s a strong favourite to win the position, and he polls very well in hypothetical matchups against Pollievre right now.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            The latest polls still show a blowout victory for the Conservatives:

            https://newsinteractives.cbc.ca/elections/poll-tracker/canada/

            I don’t think it’s at all likely that the Liberals could win another majority, even another minority. That sucks because the conservatives always wreck stuff when they win. But there’s this determined “things are bad, vote the current party out” mentality right now.

            • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              7 hours ago

              It’s not the current numbers in the polls you need to look at, it’s the direction of the trend. Over the last few weeks if you compare numbers from the same pollsters you see a very rapid move away from the Conservatives. The polls still show a blowout for them, and even if current movements continue, they’ll show a blowout for a while yet. FPTP voting systems produce very strong outcomes from very small differences, so it takes a while for trends in likely vote intention to translate into changes in seat counts. But if the current trends continue, you will see those seat counts change.

              There are no guarantees of course, but also you need to keep in mind that Canadian politics are very different from US politics. Our polls tend to readjust strongly once an actual election is called. Polling outside of a campaign tends not to be as reliable an indicator of vote intention as it does in the US where they effectively have two year long elections.

              • merc@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                56 minutes ago

                Canadian politics also has a very reliable cycle where the conservatives get elected, stay around too long, get blown out in an election that the Liberals win. Then the liberals get elected, stay around too long, and get blown out in an election that the Conservatives win.

                When Pierre Trudeau lost his popularity, John Turner took over for a few months, but then Mulroney’s conservatives blew him out of the water in the next election. When Mulroney became massively unpopular, Kim Campbell became PM for a few months until Chretien took over. When Chretien handed over to Paul Martin, he actually managed to win an election before it swung back to Harper and his Conservatives. The country is overdue for a swing back to the Conservatives. Changing the leader never works. Whoever becomes PM after a very unpopular leader quits gets a very short term.

                Thinking this time is going to be different is just wishful thinking.

        • gift_of_gab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          And Jagmeet Singh has proven to be pretty useless.

          Other than getting us pharmacare and dental added to our health care, sure.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Pharmacare? Has it arrived? Or is it something they’re still working on? As for dental added to healthcare, are you sure? Or was it just added for people with low-income?

            • gift_of_gab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Pharmacare? Has it arrived? Or is it something they’re still working on? As for dental added to healthcare, are you sure? Or was it just added for people with low-income?

              That’s on the Liberals, the NDP forced them into action.

              This is like the fifth time the NDP has managed to change all our lives for the better while not even the official opposition, but they get called ‘useless’ either way.

              • merc@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                the NDP forced them into action

                Yes, and I’m showing that the action they were forced into was so small as to be essentially meaningless. So, that undermines their accomplishments, wouldn’t you say?

                This is like the fifth time the NDP has managed to change all our lives

                All our lives? Again, is this dental plan open to everyone?

                There’s a reason they’re not even the opposition, and that’s because they can barely even convince left-leaning Canadians to support them anymore.