• PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Restrictions on bribery are like gun control.

      They will never wholly get rid of the issue, because they don’t address the core cause - but they reduce the tools available to the perpetrators, which has a positive effect of reducing the symptoms.

      Lifting this restriction is minor, but also unambiguously bad, both morally and practically.

  • CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    To clarify, we all know the Citizens United decision legalized bribery of Congress; this article talks about the removal of protections on bribery and revolving door practices in the executive branch. With those protections in place he might have had trouble filling his administration with his favorite billionaires.

  • Coreidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    It was never illegal. Its called lobbying and it’s what billionaires have been doing for decades.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    There is a big difference between making something legal and not giving a shit about whether or not it is legal.

    This is the latter.

    You can’t legalize bribery via executive order, but you sure as hell can suggest you won’t be doing anything about it that way.

    The media (and way too many people here on Lemmy) need to get it into their heads that U.S. law is irrelevant to the Trump administration.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      No, the Supreme Court slowly chipped away at anything that bans corruption ever since the Powell Memo was written.