Irelephant@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 days agorulelemm.eeimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up112arrow-down10
arrow-up112arrow-down1imagerulelemm.eeIrelephant@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 days agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squareLumidaub@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoYou just need to learn to curate your feed.
minus-squaremissingno@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 days agoThe problem I have with it isn’t the feed, it’s the ownership.
minus-squareSatanClaus@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 days agogestures around wildly anyone owning social media.
minus-squaremorphballganon@mtgzone.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 days ago“How dare they not be a huge billionaire corporation that kisses Trump’s ass!” Ok buddy
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 days agoI don’t think that’s their argument. There are no bluesky instances (yet?) so power is consolidated no matter how much they have.
minus-squaremissingno@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 days agoThey are another corporation. I would’ve thought folks here would understand why corporate ownership of social media is ultimately the problem.
You just need to learn to curate your feed.
The problem I have with it isn’t the feed, it’s the ownership.
Specifically who?
gestures around wildly anyone owning social media.
“How dare they not be a huge billionaire corporation that kisses Trump’s ass!” Ok buddy
I don’t think that’s their argument. There are no bluesky instances (yet?) so power is consolidated no matter how much they have.
They are another corporation.
I would’ve thought folks here would understand why corporate ownership of social media is ultimately the problem.