BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.worldM to InsanePeopleFacebook@lemmy.world · 7 months agoSovcit thinks the real estate agent is crazy.lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1112arrow-down12
arrow-up1110arrow-down1external-linkSovcit thinks the real estate agent is crazy.lemmy.worldBonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.worldM to InsanePeopleFacebook@lemmy.world · 7 months agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squareedric@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up41·7 months agoLmao if adding that to their signature means it’s not legally binding, then the title and deed for the house isn’t legally binding either; so how do they expect to get the house.
minus-square𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·7 months agoNo, no, no! It’s rules for thee. None for me.
minus-squareOutsizedWalrus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoAnd, they’d be committing fraud since they’re inducing the other party to believe it’s a valid signature.
Lmao if adding that to their signature means it’s not legally binding, then the title and deed for the house isn’t legally binding either; so how do they expect to get the house.
No, no, no! It’s rules for thee. None for me.
Possession is 9/10s of the uh law.
And, they’d be committing fraud since they’re inducing the other party to believe it’s a valid signature.