TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 months agoWe'll settle for homes we own, but that's too much apparently 🙄lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1348arrow-down10
arrow-up1348arrow-down1external-linkWe'll settle for homes we own, but that's too much apparently 🙄lemmy.worldTotallynotJessica@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 months agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-squareenglislanguage@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoWhich is more expensive for the state, i.e., even from a pure capitalist point of view the least favorable option.
minus-squaredoubtingtammy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-27 months agoFrom a Pure capitalist POV, the only thing wrong with that scenario is that the prisoners probably won’t be working. Or won’t be working enough. Capitalism isn’t concerned with a balanced state budget
minus-squareAsafum@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·7 months agoNah in America prisoner are literal slaves as allowed in the 13th amendment so the GAP and Nike will be plenty happy the more people are in prison. :(
Which is more expensive for the state, i.e., even from a pure capitalist point of view the least favorable option.
From a Pure capitalist POV, the only thing wrong with that scenario is that the prisoners probably won’t be working. Or won’t be working enough. Capitalism isn’t concerned with a balanced state budget
Nah in America prisoner are literal slaves as allowed in the 13th amendment so the GAP and Nike will be plenty happy the more people are in prison. :(