hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agoA bit latelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square102linkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up12arrow-down1imageA bit latelemmy.blahaj.zonehungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square102linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaredeaf_fish@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoWhy? The sign seems fine to me.
minus-squareKedly@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoBecause thereal’s version is welcoming and non discriminatory, and the meme is antagonistic by design
minus-squaredeaf_fish@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoYes, it is antagonistic. But is it bad to be antagonistic to people who think that men’s feelings are more important that women’s safety?
minus-squareKedly@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYeah, ok, with this response and your other one, I’m blocking you now
Why? The sign seems fine to me.
Because thereal’s version is welcoming and non discriminatory, and the meme is antagonistic by design
Yes, it is antagonistic. But is it bad to be antagonistic to people who think that men’s feelings are more important that women’s safety?
Yeah, ok, with this response and your other one, I’m blocking you now