jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 10 months agoTrump Allies Try to Convince Supreme Court He'd Never Order Hit on Rivalwww.rollingstone.comexternal-linkmessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1204arrow-down17
arrow-up1197arrow-down1external-linkTrump Allies Try to Convince Supreme Court He'd Never Order Hit on Rivalwww.rollingstone.comjeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 10 months agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squareRubberDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·edit-210 months agoIsn’t that besides the point? The question is if he a president should be legally not-allowed to order the hit, but be immune from prosecution if he did order it anyway.
minus-squareRubberDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·10 months agoYeah they are making it extra muddy by trying to conflate the 2. But the conflation between in-office / out-of-office as well as part of his duties/ nothing to do with his duties.
Isn’t that besides the point?
The question is if
hea president should be legally not-allowed to order the hit, but be immune from prosecution if he did order it anyway.deleted by creator
Yeah they are making it extra muddy by trying to conflate the 2. But the conflation between in-office / out-of-office as well as part of his duties/ nothing to do with his duties.