Video to point the opposite

  • Eldritch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It all depends on the pro and the type of software needed. Linux is great for a lot of things. But there are a number of things that are not its fault. Which it lacks for many professionals. Namely certain software availability. The os itself is fine

    • Pechente@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I absolutely agree. For me the most lacking part is media creation software. Neither Adobe nor Affinity apps are available and no, GIMP is not a Photoshop replacement despite many users claiming it. The non-destructive workflow is severely lacking.

      • Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sorry I work in VFX, we’ve been on Linux desktops for 25 years creating pretty pictures. All the professional packages are there, Maya, Nuke, Māri, Houdini all work perfectly.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah it’s mostly the Adobe suit and a few odds and ends. And as long as that software is being developed, there is no reason it couldn’t be brought to Linux.