I just disagree, but that’s okay. This is about presentation of code to the viewer which makes it a responsibility of the IDE and not a responsibility of the language. You’re right that the line references would need to be kept in sync, but I think that would be trivial.
This makes more sense, to me, to be stored in some IDE project config file than be present in and cluttering up the actual source code. This should be an IDE feature instead of a language feature IMO
We really should defederate from this shit
conflates two completely different points about propaganda and losing-because-not-using-nukes together
Brainwashed is the appropriate term to describe nationalistic ideology, yes
It has value in natural language processing, like turning unstructured natural language data into structured data. Not suitable for all situations though, like situations that cannot tolerate hallucinations.
Its also good for reorganizing information and presenting it in a different format; and also classification of semantic meaning of text. It’s good for pretty much anything dealing with semantic meaning, really.
I see people often trying to use generative AI as a knowledge store, such as asking an AI assistant factual questions, but this is an invalid usecase.
I agree with you in that they should all be held accountable including Pelosi.
That said, the source is Fortune… I’m not exactly shocked that this article isn’t 100% honest or telling whole-truths…
I choose to become a nuclear submarine: radiation + sub-mariner + super hearing
Ah okay, we are just describing the same thing 👍 I agree, this will be our future
I don’t think that answered my question, but maybe I just don’t understand what you mean.
I could see a world where media outlets and publishers sign their published content in order to make it verifiable what the source of the content is, for a hypothetical example, AP news could sign photographs taken by a journalist, and if it is a reputable source that people trust to not be creating misinformation, then they can trust the signed content.
I don’t really see a way that digital signatures can be applied to content created and posted by untrusted users in order to verify that they aren’t AI generated or misinformation.
Honest question. What will stop someone from getting AI generated images digitally signed as well? Who will be the authority doing the signing?
Wait really? Its been so long since I’ve been on reddit. If this is true, then it is truly a dying husk