Just a simple restock

That’s probably not a bad approach in general, but sometimes shit matters.

I really liked that they used Farty as the AI-optimized AI.

At this point I’ll take what I can get.

Not being willing to break things is what got Dems into this position in the first place.

I agree, anything we do - they will do worse - unencumbered by ethics or morals.

We would have to shut the door behind us. Sounds shitty, but that’s what project 2025 is going to do for Republicans.

There will be no undoing of whatever happens whenever the next Republican becomes president. This is the last chance for politics to save us from that reality. We can sacrifice a few longstanding norms, knowing the risks. Or we can watch Republicans shatter all norms including the few we were trying to protect.

Can you believe all the conservative Supreme Court justices eat lunch together in the same room? Like the ideas that must be floating around that relatively unsecured… what were we talking about again?

If we get enough Dems to be able to pack the court then the “they” changes.

How would we enforce the bet?

Why 20:1 and not 1:1?

Or even 1:20 if you’re so confident?

Believe in yourself. Take the 1:20 bet.

That’ll show me.

I assumed that was their actual phone number. They received a spoofed call from themselves.

Happened to my wife once. Her own number showed up on her caller ID.

If it’s the same person I’m thinking about he understood that it was blackmail but didn’t care. He requested copies of the tape to keep for himself.

This has always bothered me. They write it so you want them to cheat.

They were bred as food for Aztec royalty and served like cornish game hens. Their ancestors are in their instincts telling them about us.

After we stood on the button and rolled up the window

Too bad the ones who need to read it are illiterate

I wish I understood this because it seems funny

Anything KOSS or PYLE is straight dog shit. Been that way for at least 25 years. I bought many of their products as a broke teenager.

Such confidence in statements that will be proven wrong in a matter of days. LOL. You’ll forget these comments by then though.

Thank your plug

What discrepancy?

Are you implying that the presence of any homeless people in New England invalidates the idea that consistently favorable weather leads to a higher ratio of homeless people living in an area?

Probably also matters long term vs short term. When someone first becomes homeless, it usually happens where they were already living regardless of the weather. Over time, people may move to where it is more comfortable to sleep outside.

So, all cities have new homeless people plus some that just never leave. And then warm areas have new homeless people plus the long term homeless people who risked traveling to get to warmer temperatures.

Sooo… Boebert had 9 videos on that site. I hope they come out for a number of reasons.