It indeed doesn’t work. Has been tried countless times. Whole eastern europe, North Korea, China and many more countries. It failed every single time because communism is a fundamentally broken system.

And please, don’t try to convince me that communism in the eastern bloc failed due to US.

So you would be happier getting abused by authoritarian regimes in North Korea, for example? Weird flex but okay.

Yes, those are definitely the best places to live. Especially compared to ugly capitalists states such as luxembourg or switzerland.

If US is the biggest obstacle to communism worldwide, then god bless america lol

Those advantages of women they have compared to men are literally nothing compared to the advantages men have. Here is an example where sisters Williams tried to beat ~350 man in world rankings and it just didn’t go well: https://www.tennisnow.com/Blogs/NET-POSTS/November-2017-(1)/The-Man-Who-Beat-Venus-and-Serena-Back-to-Back.aspx

Same for other sports. I used to to skiing and in junior leagues, men were seconds ahead of women on the same track.

Cmon… Imposing tariffs on your allies is not the way you build economy.

That aged like milk lol

These radical left wing parties have have basically similar potential for government as radical right wing ones and are similarly dangerous.

As a someone whose country belonged to the western bloc, I can relate xD

Rather than “Democrats” you should put “US no matter what”

Let me ask you a question: Harris Or Trump?

Just like for the past 70 years

Yeah, each time I “subscribe” for sth I use a prepaid card. Once the transaction is made, it destroys itself.

let’s fucking goo

Same. I had S3, then LG v10 and both lost support after 2 years and because unusable. So I bought iphone xr and now it’s my 6th year with it. And it works fine, I just had to replace the battery.

That’s valid. Thanks for clarification.

Sorry, but then I do not understand your logic. To me it seems like you are saying that people should be able to burn Quran (because freedom of speech) but at the same time you believe that burning a trans flag* should not be tolerated. Where is the difference? I am not saying that your opinion is incorrect, I am just unsure what your stand is because suddenly when your logic is applied to a different situation, you refuse to respond

Also, if you believe that ad hominem will make your argument look stronger, then you are clearly wrong.

*Just to make sure: I support all LGBTI rights, I just used them as a comparison.

I would not necessarily say it’s because people don’t understand Muslims. I myself have nothing in common with Muslims, as well.

More likely the case is that there are 2 approaches to free speech. First one advocates for absolute free speech whilst the second is more aligned with “my liberty ends where yours begins” phrase.

Would you also consider chants such as “death to all Jews/gays/black people” or actions such as burning trans flag as freedom of speech and do you believe it should be tolerated?

So the general issue why burning such a copy should be considered incorrect is the fact that Quran, apart from being just another book, is a symbol of Islamic religion. Hence why it appears offensive to Muslims. Same logic applies to other symbols. Do you think it’s absolutely okay to come to a square and burn LGBTI or BLM flags. If you were a gay and saw someone else burning a rainbow flag, would you feel safe at such place?