I enjoy OpenMW and I’m happy to host if you want, although my instance is basically just me and a few friends right now.

Yep!

*rate, comment, and subscribe

Gotta get those five stars

That’s a nice rice!

How are you finding awesomewm? I’ve just been on i3 since forever but I’m always interested to hear about other WMs

I think they’re lawful evil, more devils than demons.

I use Alpine Linux quite a bit, which is a Linux distro that doesn’t use the GNU coreutils or glibc.

Also even giving GNU such a high level in the name on a distro like Arch makes little sense imo because other components like systemd are arguably much more important than one of many libc libraries you can optionally use and a bunch of coreutils you can also optionally use.

In my experience I haven’t had an issue because usually the refactorings are small. If they’re not I just hop on a call with the person who wrote the MR and ask them to walk me through it.

In theory I’d like to have time to dedicate solely to code health, but that’s not quite the situation in basically any team I’ve been in.

You should refactor as needed as you go because refactoring cases are never gonna be prioritised.

That sounds like bug propaganda right there

There’s a markdown entry thing in the drop down menu that’ll convert your MD to their formatting.

Yeah, I’m not justifying the annexation.

Technically only some of HK was under the lease, some was indefinitely controlled by the British. However, you’re still right because of the military force difference.

I attempted to boot Mandrake/Mandrivia on an old laptop once and failed, then I mucked around in Slackware’s live CD for an afternoon. The first thing I actually installed and used daily was Ubuntu 10.04.

The web is built on hot linking hypermedia. It is more fragile obviously, but it distributes the bandwidth and storage load. If nobody hotlinked, then small forum admins/Lemmy admins/etc. have considerably more cost to bear.

Rust is roughly similar to C in most of these benchmarks and beats it in a few: https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/fastest/rust.html

Arguably when LLVM gets a bit better, Rust can be even faster than C because rust can be optimised in more places safely than C code can. The issue is that LLVM wasn’t written with that in mind, so some performance is left on the table.

Go, Java, and Nim (in most cases) are all memory safe but are generally slower than C or C++ due to the ways they achieve memory safety.

Rust’s memory safety approach is zero-cost performance wise, which makes it practical for low level, high throughput, and low latency applications.

That flag exists, it’s called unsafe for if you need to tell the borrow checker to trust you or unwrap if you don’t want to deal with handling errors on most ADTs.

You can always cast anything to an unmanaged pointer type and use it in unsafe code.

A crash is different to a SEGFAULT. I’d be very surprised to see a safe rust program segfault unless it was actively exploiting a compiler bug.

You need everyone else in the EU to agree to remove them. Poland and Hungary sort of protect each other from EU consequences.

They’re both free software licences (i.e. you can get the source code for for BSD licenced software and GPL licenced software that you’re using at no extra charge and modify it as you please). The GPL licence has an additional restriction for developers that says if you use any GPL code in your codebase, your entire codebase must also be GPL or some other compatible open source licence.

This means that if I made some code parses a file format and another developer includes that code in their program to support that file format, they’re now forced to licence their whole codebase with a similar licence to the GPL. If it was BSD then they would only have to mention that they used my BSD licenced code and include a copy of that licence. A user would then be able to go and see my original code that was used, but not the rest of that application’s code or any modifications that the application author made to my code. Because the GPL is too restrictive for most developers here, there’s a version of the GPL called the LGPL which is often used for code meant to be used by other programs which is closer to the BSD licence but additionally requires that if they modify your code, they must also share that modified code.

I usually use a licence in the middle called the MPL (Mozilla Public Licence), which is similar to the LGPL but has a few things I prefer and has the advantage for me of not being connected to the FSF and GNU project.