Yes I use pocket and am fairly satisfied.

Why do I use it? Well, I have been using it for about 6 years, was the first thing to work fine in my mobile, don’t want to install another extension in ff, hate bookmark handling by ff (at least in mobile), and want to push myself in reading.

Although I nowadays see too much american articles in pocket to be relevant for me.

How many clues have been spilled here to show s/he is american?

Learned from the teacher. Thanks.

Autumn.

Get it, americans

That’s what I feared and I removed my entire content from google photo 6 years ago. Also my spouse’s.

I have seen worse. Normie’s around me use their phone to capture photo of the laptop screen and send the low pixel photo with less than half part in it including the actual document.

Wait. Winter is coming

Some things last over my lifetime, and that’s “lasts” enough.

Shows how much been biased countrywise the posts are. And internet in general.

You don’t know bang! ? Oh, google doesn’t have the feature.

Spot on mate! Love you. Made my day

In scenario 1, legit or not, you said the chance is still 50-50. In other scenarios also you shouldn’t change or it wouldn’t matter. That’s what I say, just in the opposite direction. But the problem of probability depends on the wordings and phrases, which means I may not have understood the ques well.

Another angle: You explained the Monty Hall problem at the end that the probability changes because in second choice we have more information. So you are implying that the initial 1/3 probability of the now-open door adds to the door we did not choose - making the switch advisable. Here I also say the probability does change from initial 1/3, but to 1/2-1/2 for each remaining doors; why should the probability be poured to the unselected single door?

Or there are 2 possibilities and then you introduce a 3rd door that is never correct?

Yes that one. Similar to the one you did with 100 doors, just in opposite direction.

Hang on, that’s not a decreasing trend. 1/√4 is not smaller, but larger than 1/4…?

Great. Can you give me example of decreasing trend slower than that function curve?, where summation doesn’t give finite value? A simple example please, I am not math scholar.

In this example, there were 100 choices in the beginning, and later you reduced to 2 choices. Clearly an advantage. Does the same apply to the 3 door problem?

Let’s take this question in another angle. Instead of 3, there are only 2 doors. I am to choose one out of 2, which has a prize. After I choose one, you show me a third door which is empty. Now, should I change my option?

I: 27

You: The number is either 27 or 44. Do you want to change your choice?

I: why would I?

The same reason we use ship for a cargo and car for shipping.

That’s what Buddhas have been saying!

So the resolution lies in the secret that a decreasing trend up to infinity adds up to a finite value. This is well explained by Gabriel’s horn area and volume paradox: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZOi9HH5ueU