I’ll often choose an after-dinner drink, because I usually stuff myself during the main course. Maybe I’ll order an Espresso Martini. Or I’ll go full Dude and order a White Russian. Or whatever else looks good.
When stumped, I’ll ask the server for a suggestion. I try to give them something to work with, like “sweet”, “creamy” or “citrusy”.
I refuse to go to foxbusiness.com to read the story, so I’ll just laugh at the headline. It’s probably the best part anyway.
As bad as the wording is, it’s better than “fuck ‘em”.
These were exactly the kind of “legal shenanigans” I had in mind.
I’m kinda surprised they worked with them in the first place
Meanwhile, fingernail scrapings taken from Cummings revealed an unknown male DNA profile and nothing from Rojem. This was potentially powerful exculpatory evidence. But a third jury, unaware of the DNA testing, resentenced him to die.
How on Earth was the third jury “unaware” of the DNA testing? Was it because of legal shenanigans, or a fantastically bad defense? Also, why was there even a third trial to begin with?
Good for Rajan. I hope he doesn’t give up.
While the headline itself isn’t much of a surprise, I’m somewhat bewildered to see diabetes listed among the illnesses. Then again, I know nothing about diabetes.
…and the agency’s independent hearing board pointed to the facility’s paint shop operations as a specific problem.
Good thing that won’t affect the Cybertruck, the widely adored and flawless jewel in Tesla’s crown!
They can whine about unscrupulous pitchmen all they want, but at some point, unethical behavior goes so far above and beyond that it becomes impressive.
I hope that whoever convinced McDonald’s to agree to this crap back in 2019 got an award and an obscenely gigantic commission.
I don’t mind pedantic comments nearly as much when the author owns it. Well done! (Also, the unnecessary apostrophe bugged me, too.)
“Welcome to the party, pal.” - John McClane, Die Hard (1988)
I… damn.
I feel like I’m missing a reference (should I know who Khajiit is?) but I like it anyway!
It’s ironic because thoughtful criticism is helpful. The “tell me why I’m wrong” bit is a remark meant for others, not you.
I haven’t read the book. I’ve only read about it… but from what I know, I don’t think I’d go with “love story” either. Ick.