Elon is always what he claims to destroy.

Everything from bot use on Twitter to the carbon fuel use.

For now. Internationally, that phrase has been around for much longer than that, and I think it will be around for a lot longer.

I’ve always viewed it as a call to repurpose the resources currently hoarded by the rich.

I think Reddit is just pretending to interpret it as incitement to cannibalism.

I’m seriously impaired, so all humans will start dying in a matter of weeks.

On the plus side, everything in that book The World Without Us will come to pass, and the planet’s environment and ecology will be better off.

Nooo, enshitification. I’ve only recently stared using it.

What do we use instead? Is Matrix the only option?

I think I’m just going to have to agree to disagree.

AI getting a diagnosis wrong is one thing.

AI being bulit in such a way that it hands out destructive advice human scientists already know is wrong, like vaccines cause autism, homeopathy, etc, is a malevolent and irresponsible use of tech imo.

To me, it’s like watching a civilization downgrading it’s own scientific progress.

I take your point. The version I heard of that joke is “the person who graduated at the bottom of their class in med school”.

Still, at the moment we can try to avoid those doctors. I’m concerned about the popularizing and replication of bad advice beyond that.

The problem here is this tool is being marketed to GPs, not patients, so you wouldn’t necessarily know where the opinion is coming from.

I’d hope the bar for medical advice is higher than “better than the worst doctor”.

Will be interesting to see where liability lies with this one. In the example given, following the advice could permanently worsen patients.

Given that the advice is proven to be wrong and goes against official medical guidance for doctors, that could potentially be material for a class action lawsuit.

When we look at passing scores, is there any way to quantitatively grade them for magnitude?

Not all bad advice is created equal.

It would have to be the fail rate of an average doctor, because if average doctors are the use case then moving the bar to fail rate of a bad doctor doesn’t make any sense. You would end up saying worse outcomes = better.

I think the missing piece here is accountability.

If doctors are being encouraged to give harmful out-of-date advice, who will end up with a class action lawsuit on their hands - doctors or OE?

Openr

Openster

Open .io

Flying from Melbourne to Doha is almost entirely over the ocean.

With 4 hours left in a 13h flight, they were probably near Sri Lanka but the Colombo airport is one of the busiest in South Asia, and as you say, it’s a huge hassle to divert.

It happened over the sea.

I feel like they low key hated that particular couple.

One of the first people to see the potential of television in its early days was actually Adolf Hitler. He hoped that one day there would be one in every town. And now the internet is doing what he hoped television would do.

Ikr. Doing that with the richest man instead does not seem to have the same effect.

President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho will be interested.

P.s I’m liv@pixelfed.nz

Thanks, cool! I was able to start following you by searching for lifeinmultiplec@breeze.pictures in my instance. For some reason your pictures aren’t showing up for me yet but maybe it will populate soon.

Me too. I can’t find you on pixelfed?