The next candidate that pledges to adopt Bernie’s vision will easily win against whoever their opponent happens to be. That’s all Democrats ever have to do.
Trump won by swaying Tech Billionaires and campaigning directly to citizens on the platforms they use the most about the issues they cared about. As much as I hate it, it was effective af.
Assuming we ever have a legit election again, we need to look beyond the two party system, otherwise we’re just further dooming ourselves.
Depends on if they have the financial ability to choose not to own it.
It’s a superposition. He’s president when the President does something largely accepted as “good” while also not being President when the President does something largely accepted as “bad”.
This transcends all known perceptions of cause/effect to ensure their sand-based castle continues to stand. That’s what they mean by 4D Chess.
….that Biden proposed and negotiated. Also he hasn’t been inaugurated yet lol.
Says who? An anonymous source on a paywalled article from a side with a heavy bias?
Because my less biased source already proved otherwise.
At this point you’re just creating headcanon and arguing with that.
Downvoting doesn’t make you any less wrong.
Trump is claiming credit for all of it. Biden is claiming credit for the agreement, while acknowledging Trump was kept informed and is responsible for the implementation.
Anyone with internet access can compare what we know about the plan and what Biden proposed last year and see the similarities.
Just because Trump posted to social media first doesn’t mean he did shit.
Now you’re just grasping at air to try and not be wrong.
lol or you and that articles anonymous sources were wrong….
Its ok to be wrong. I find it kinda funny though that you had to downvote a purely factual article just because you didn’t like the development of the situation.
It can’t be the source because you used the same one 40 minutes ago: https://lemmy.ml/comment/16115856
No need, just changed the definition.
In the words of System of a Down:
Although Democrats did completely drop the ball on this and never should have sent Israel anything, we also got the terms of this deal last year from Biden, so there also that.
Oh wait you’re from hexbear. You’ll just double down anyway.
Can’t commit further genocide if there’s nobody left to genocide! 🤡
Dude Trump isn’t even in office yet lol.
Your logic as viewed by everyone else:
“If it’s good, Trump did it. If it’s bad, it’s Biden’s fault.”
PLEASE tell me you’re thinking it through more than this, then let’s have a dialogue about that thought process because I am incredibly curious how you got there.
Kool aid comes in multiple colors.
What makes you think Trump should get the credit?
Biden said his admin and the incoming Trump admin worked together on it, and Trump’s is responsible for the implementation and continuance of the agreement.
Regardless of raw GDP per capita there are wealthier nations who could do this. Norway’s positioning to do so smoothly doesn’t invalidate the decision itself.
Again, if the rest of the world curbed our addiction to fossil fuels they wouldn’t sell as much oil. But as long as they are I’m ok with them using the profits for stuff like this.
Using profits derived from fossil fuels to transition to cleaner technology is exactly what we should be doing.
There are multiple kinds, but that’s not the important part here.
Much of the world does not have the infrastructure to allow for most people to charge their car at home at all is what I meant to say, apartments are a great example. Unfortunately public transit in my area is also not great, so a car is required to do much of anything.
If you can’t go anywhere without a car and you can’t charge your car at home, it becomes difficult to justify an EV. But that’s not the EV’s fault, that’s the fault of our infrastructure failing to keep up.
Ideally public transit would be the solution, but some places aren’t likely to see improvements to that for a while.
Any country could do this, and it’s a bigger start than most are making. I think the “barely any effort” bit was relative compared to what other, bigger, richer countries are prioritizing instead.
Maybe it’s not literally effortless but compared to other countries, yeah.
I’m not trying to give them a free pass at selling oil or anything, but this is a much better use of the profits compared to other countries.
I’d rather see a country exporting fossil fuels doing something with that money to not use fossil fuels than give it to Billionaires or something.
If more countries followed their example, there wouldn’t be much demand left for that oil.
Not with those depreciation rates they can’t.