They’ll make a bigger car to drive over it

I don’t think you understand. I know privacy extension is for outbound and not inbound, but what use is it on a server?

Denmark takes your car on the first offense. You’re not getting it back. Doesn’t matter if it’s not your car. Doesn’t matter if you’re not a citizen.

I think there’s some misunderstanding

I get how IPv6 works, I got a /48 from my ISP. The problem is that I have some 15 devices here that I have to refer to in DNS and either I have to change their static IPs or I have to change their IPs in DNS if the prefix ever changes (it shouldn’t, because I pay for them to not do that). My laptop, phone and desktop do not get a static IPv6 and use the privacy extension. Is that not how you’re supposed to do it?

if your prefix ever changes you’ll have to update it everywhere

I mean that’s a good point but I’m paying money to not have my prefix changed. If I were to do it the intended way using DNS, how would I set up the DNS to be prefix agnostic? How would I reference devices in the firewall?

Very useful, but I don’t understand concept 1, “Don’t pick numbers”.

If I’m right, it’s basically saying don’t do stuff manually, just let the computer do it. I kind of disagree with this. All of my fixed devices have a fixed IP that I manually assigned and derived from the original v4 schema I also have. For example 192.168.x.y becomes prefix::y

Am I misunderstanding something?

I can’t afford a lawyer so I have no wishy washy ideals of taking a corporation to court for stealing my work ☺️

It appears that -s is simply incompatible with i3wm in that it spawns an interactive process and i3wm can’t do that. Removing or changing the flag to something that does not require any interaction works.

Tolerance is a social contract; anyone in breach need not be tolerated as they have broken the contract themselves.

I do 🥰

That doesn’t solve the problem of me needing other peoples githubs repos on a VPS with no v4

Yeah let me self-host other peoples github repos because github doesn’t have IPv6 lmao dude

Yes but IPv4 is becoming expensive and it’s annoying having to use a middleman to clone github repos on a v6-only VPS

IPv6 is not hard, there is no excuse not to have it

Yeah I’m the entitled asshole with my bike because I wanna go from A to B

Not the person who takes up 8 times as much space as me to transport the same or more often less cargo than me, poisons the air I breathe, pollutes my drinking water, endangers my life because they’re busy reading texts or think their time is more valuable than everyone elses, uses my tax dollars to fund massive roads I’m not even allowed to use and, best of all, honks at me to get out of the way on the narrow streets I live on as if I’m the uninvited guest.

But one dude in spandex made you swerve a little some 2 years ago so go off queen

Please educate me. Why can’t they fix the client to not allow headless mode to join servers? It’s not like the server software relies on it- it’s a completely different piece of software that has little to do with the client. Who’s getting hurt by simply not allowing headless clients?

If my ISP didn’t constantly break my network from their side, I’d have effectively no downtime and nearly zero maintenance. I don’t live on the bleeding edge and I don’t do anything particularly experimental and most of my containers are as minimal as possible

I built my own x86 router with OpnSense Proxmox hypervisor Cheapo WiFi AP Thinkcentre NAS (just 1 drive, debian with Samba) Containers: Tor relay, gonic, corrade, owot, apache, backups, dns, owncast

All of this just works if I leave it alone

Lower class citizens and by extension the vast majority of immigrants are not treated very well by the official danish institutions. It is no surprise to me that many give up prospects and stay in (or turn to) a life of crime. This article is dumb.

why are people so upset about this?

My tenants are living in a house that they wouldn’t be able to afford on their own in today’s market.

zero self-awareness fuckin lol

I’m going to whip out my 12 hour Oblivion retrospective that I watched in one sitting as evidence to the contrary to support his point: This video is padding, it’s very slow and it doesn’t really get to that many points.

It is OK to criticize media, even if you enjoyed it. This video seems to be long-form for the sake of being long-form, not because it has a lot of ground to cover. I don’t particularly care, it mostly ran in the background, but it’s a legitimate criticism.

I’ve also personally noticed that I tend to click off 10-minute videos in 2 minutes if they don’t get to a point or say something interesting, because the trend is that it’s pushing for time to keep you engaged to show you more ads and it’s a huge waste of my time. Whatever that video eventually gets around to saying could’ve been a twitter post.

I think the point is that root is a universal user found on all linux systems where as users have all kinds of names. It narrows down the variables to brute-force, so simply removing the ability to use it means they have to guess a username and a password.