Exposing kids to sex too early isn’t good for their development.

Can you elaborate on negative aspects of early sex ed? You only provided the positive examples, and I’m curious now

In spite of that, reports I’ve seen claim that the Americans are actually generally satisfied with Trump’s conduct thus far

I’m European, can any American confirm this?

I’d say it’s more of a HENRY thing (high earning, not rich yet), but I very much agree.

On the other side, I can’t name any rich person mannerism I’d call remotely positive. Maybe some Old Money humbleness, but that’s also pretty rare.

Nope, not gonna work. Not against Cafeteria Christians all of them are.

Define bad for the world. You can say this man is a deranged maniac able to implode the entire western order, leading to countless lives in ruin, insane social imbalance and strenghtening of our enemies, and literally burning our planet.

But all that doesn’t matter, becaude corpos don’t care. They only understand money. They don’t care about long-term consequences, they are humungous instant gratification machines centered around generating profit.

Value of the dollar is much more important to them than the wellbeing of the world.

Cool, now it’s just 8 years of waiting for release and then just 4 more until they make it playable

I guess you can call it being a doombass

I don’t get it

Better check again, pal

The idea of a man revoking intrusive thoughts instead of simply embracing them is just straight out repulsive!

I hardly know’er!

Never really got into it, but it does still have some massive following in the Eastern Europe.

Every old geezer around here will wreck your ass given the chance.

What the fuck is wrong with you

You made me look ridiculously stupid and rightfully so. Actually, I take that back, I made myself look stupid and you made it obvious as it gets! Thanks for the wake up call

If I understand correctly, the model is in a way a dictionary of questions with responses, where the journey of figuring out the response is skipped. As in, the answer for the question “What’s the point of existence” is “42”, but it doesn’t contain the thinking process that lead to this result.

If that’s so, then wouldn’t it be especially prone to hallucinations? I don’t imagine it would respond adequately to the third “why?” in the row.

How else does it figure out what to say if it doesn’t have the access to the internet? Genuine question, I don’t imagine you’re dowloading the entire dataset with the model.

How do you know it isn’t communicating with their servers? Obviously it needs internet connection to work, so what’s stopping it from sending your data?

And how does that help with the privacy?

I love asking him “Was 1989 a good year for China?” with DeepThink enabled.

You can see him thinking for a second before he goes “[…] Hmm, I need to keep in mind that…” and then you just see him crash abruptly

What am I looking at? What’s the reason behind this collapse?

Depends who you ask, just make sure you don’t start off with them furries