Reddit hat Paywalls für Subreddits angekündigt

Was für ein lächerlicher Move. Vermutlich machen es genug mit, aber das ist ja peinlich.

Reddit warnt Nutzer [sic!] die zu viele problematische Inhalte hochwählen

Was gilt denn als problematisch? Und was heißt Warnung? Hat das auch wirkliche Konsequenzen? Klingt entweder gut bzgl. Fake News, Beleidigung usw. oder einschüchtern, falls es so läuft wie bei Musk und Meta

making Tuta Mail the world’s first email provider that can protect emails from quantum computer attacks.

I don’t see how mails are secured when being sended from or to a Tutanota user and to or from a non Tutanota user. Those mails are only secured on their servers.

This. You can’t use your client, not on your phone nor on your PC. Therefore Tutanota was never a viable option

They changed some basics from Mull and decided to go other ways. That’s why I’m not using thus browser

Now it is easy to decide whether Proton is viable or not. Not their first strike. Hopefully users now know what their philosophy is

Hell no. The oposite. He is in favour for chat control. Thus going to be the end for freedom and democracy in Europe

I don’t think so

But it’s Telegram. Avoiding laws, their registered office tells us enough. No encryption (only in a few cases after one’s own initiative). I don’t see a better option.

First of all, Signals code is open. Many people arround the world can check (and they already did) if the messenger lives up to its promises, is secure, private and so on. The others are not. Whatever you think they do, you have to trust a company like Meta. You wanna be that naive?

All those apps collect data: when you are online, where you are online, who is talking to who. Maybe also what you are talking about… we can’t know. For example: Some psychatrists do not use WhatsApp because using such an app in the waiting room would provide Meta with information like ‘you have mental health issues’. Signal on the other hand does verifiable not collect such data.

We also can see bahaviours coming from big companies to direct societies into a direction of their favor. They act like this, because maximum profit and power is what they are working for - they are simply companies. Signal on the other hand is a foundation which aims to provide security, encryption, privacy and fight against censorship (not in terms of content but in terms of countries blocking messenger services). What could be the more trustworthy base?

Btw Signal uses donations to pay their development and Servers so you can use the app for free. What does Meta use to handle costs for WhatsApp, Facebook and so on… Maybe they are charitable 🤞

To name differences:

• No adds
• No tracking
• Local backup (not on Google services or something like that)
• No exchange of personal data like phone number (they use a hash instead)
• You can use a pseudonym in form of a user name to get in contact with others (without telling them your phone number) and you can easily delete it and use a new one
• Signal created the Signal protocol which is called the gold standard, as it is the most secure and to encryption mechanism. They were the first so add resistance against quantum computers

And finally the better question is:
Why should the world use WhatsApp and co and not Signal? They do not have one advantage. If the whole world would use Signal, Threema or similar apps, it wouldn’t lose anything but would win so much. Think about that

Ganz einfach so, wie es auch zugeordnet ist.

Länderübergreifende Themen des DACH-Raums in DACH. (Keine Schweiz-Themen, keine Bundestagswahl etc., denn das ist ja nicht für alle aus DACH relevant. Dafür Schweiz-Community bilden etc.)

Deutschland betreffende Themen in Deutschland.

Themen zur Bundestagswahl ist Deutschland betreffend und kommt natürlich in Deutschland. Eine eigene Community ergibt da gar keinen Sinn.

Startpage.com does not