People really have no clue what’s going on in France, huh.

Can it be worse than saying that you can rape a woman into becoming straight and she’ll like it? I highly doubt it.

Surprising as one could wonder how his god would let him get sick at all instead of performing his holy duties.

The idea of punishment is to prevent further misbehaviours, not to throw shit back at the kids. The goal is to teach the proper behaviour.

But hell is supposed to be eternal, and as such there is no evolving from it, making it not a punishment but a torture.

Now if you believe in torturing kids who misbehave just for the sake of making them suffer, that’s something else.

The fact that the “president” is much closer to a monarch/dictator than it has ever been in a pretty long time, and more than it has ever been without being in a context of war.

Just stop

And they definitely aren’t the ones posting under the name of “fuckyou”

Yes it is

I talked about the leader of the party of this senator, then linked a page about him.

What is going on with people here?

I said that the senator is part of a party led by a piece of shit. How does that mean they are the same person?

Are you trolling (or actively refusing to read)?

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Édouard_Philippe

Edouard Philippe (yes that’s who I was talking about) has been opposed to IVF for gay couples.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Édouard_Philippe

I didn’t have to dig very deep.

I clearly wasn’t talking about the speech, but the party and more specifically its leader.

France is the same as the US, just a few years behind.

This stupid senator is part of a party led by an anti-ecology, homophobic islamophobic dumbass, they just all want to do like Trump, just in their own time and version.

Opposing the US is just about taking advantage of the situation to say “look, I am reasonable, unlike them” and has nothing to do with what they think.

Think, talk, repeat until you reach a conclusion.

“Americans” are not an ethnicity. Talking about the culture of a country is nothing similar to attaching innate characteristics to a person based on origin/skin color/etc.

This does not require ethnicity at all.

If someone is discriminated because of an ethnicity they don’t actually have (let’s say a Mexican being targeted as an “arab”) should they not get compensation ?

According to your logic, you need ethnicity to give compensation which means that you require victims to have a specific ethnicity to be recognised, but it is absurd. What makes victims victims is what they went through, not the reason they suffered abuse.

And this doesn’t even apply to colonization as in this case most of the times the former colony is now a country, and as such you can give compensation to the country and its citizens, no ethnicity required.

Either way, ethnicity is not needed.

I think that being a colonizer is not something a government should be. So yes, definitely, such a treaty is bad.

A government should be treating people as equally as possible. Ethnicity only brings unnecessary division.

A creep writer and an absurdly obscure licence.

What could go wrong.